Re: Internet vs. Telephone company vs. cable company
I've wondered if the recent advent of cable modems could change our entire Internet/telecommunications strategy. Provided that the cable network becomes widely available, more internet users would shift from using telephone lines for access to cable lines. Couple that with the use of the internet phone, and the phone line would only be necessary for communicating with non-internauts. I can see a number of ramifications for this - companies making money from long distance usage would be rather upset - and backbone providers would have to upgrade existing circuits to handle the increase in traffic. Anyone have thoughts/comments in regard to this as well? Tony Torzillo ---------------------------------------------------------------- Network Specialist, UW Network Operations Center, 543-5128 EMAIL: ndc-noc@cac.washington.edu, torzillo@cac.washington.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 31 Jan 1997, David Schwartz wrote: More than anything, the problem is due to a flat-rate monthly pricing plan for calls which are increasing in both number and length. David Schwartz On Fri, 31 Jan 1997, Tony Torzillo wrote:
My question is: Have other people heard of similar attempts by the telephone companies to have "metered Internet access"? It seems they would need a hardware level signal analyzer on their switching equipment to differentiate between voice/data. Does anyone know by what means such a technology could be implemented? What would be the legal ramifications?
Also do people agree with the claims that our local lack of available phone lines is due to Internet usage or just to lack of foresight in growth management decisions?
I've wondered if the recent advent of cable modems could change our entire Internet/telecommunications strategy. Provided that the cable network becomes widely available, more internet users would shift from using telephone lines for access to cable lines. Couple that with the use of the internet phone, and the phone line would only be necessary for communicating with non-internauts. I can see a number of ramifications for this - companies making money from long distance usage would be rather upset - and backbone providers would have to upgrade existing circuits to handle the increase in traffic. Anyone have thoughts/comments in regard to this as well?
"Yeah, sure.. we can give you high bandwidth to your home. Oh, and did I forget to mention that you get to share it with 10,000 of your closest friends?" Cable modems don't impress me.. -Wayne
On Fri, 31 Jan 1997, Tony Torzillo wrote:
I've wondered if... Provided that... ...more internet users would... ...and the phone line would only be necessary... I can see a number of ramifications... ...would be rather upset ...backbone providers would...
Anyone have thoughts/comments in regard to this as well?
You can subscribe to com-priv by sending this message subscribe com-priv to com-priv-request@lists.psi.com You know, I've wondered what would happen if people all decided to use candy canes instead of phones. This would mean that many more candy canes would be needed to replace broken and gnawed-on ones which would lead to a great increase in the demand for sugar. Not all of this could be supplied by replanting the peanut fields to sorghum so it would be necessary to come to terms with Cuba in order to get access to the quantity of sugar needed for the candy cane factories. And think of the need for loony bins and shrinks to deal with a nation of insane people! Some people would go nuts talking to the candy canes and getting no reply. Others would fall off the deep end eavesdropping on their spouse having phone sex talking to a candy cane. This would be a goldmine for anyone who had a bachelor's degree in psychology. Anyone have any thoughts/comments in regard to this as well? Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting Memra Software Inc. - Fax: +1-250-546-3049 http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael@memra.com
participants (3)
-
Michael Dillon
-
Tony Torzillo
-
Wayne Bouchard