Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers
24 Dec
2007
24 Dec
'07
10:28 a.m.
I thought we were all trying to discourage NAT in IPv6. Clearly, NAT solves the problem ... while introducing 1000 new ones. :-/
Clearly some have been trying to discourage NAT in IPv6 ensuring there'll be a 1000 problems if anyone tries.
I mean, yeah, it'd be great if we could mandate /48 ... but I just can't see it as likely to happen.
If people are supposed to have a /48 then the allocation rules should say that's what they will get. It may be xmas but it's not wise to rely on the benevolence of ISPs brandon
6209
Age (days ago)
6209
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Brandon Butterworth