Natambu, Can you please specify what platform that you are using? any why you like to do the traffic shaping on the Ethernet which is suppositly 10 Mbps? Ehab Hadi Northern Telecom Interprise Networks Ottawa, ON K1Y 4H7 Canada ehabh@hotmail.ca
From owner-nanog@merit.edu Fri Apr 24 09:59:44 1998 Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA27417; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:51:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by merit.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:50:49 -0400 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) id MAA27342 for nanog-outgoing; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:50:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from home.merit.edu (home.merit.edu [198.108.60.42]) by merit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA27334 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:50:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from ljb@localhost) by home.merit.edu (8.8.8/merit-2.0) id MAA04749 for nanog@merit.edu; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:50:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from animas.frontier.net (root@frontier.net [199.45.141.1]) by merit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA27293 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:49:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hermosa (hermosa [199.45.141.59]) by animas.frontier.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA20190 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 10:48:50 -0600 Message-ID: <00f301bd6fa1$4fdd1a70$3b8d2dc7@hermosa.frontier.net> From: "Natambu Obleton" <no@frontier.net> To: <nanog@merit.edu> Subject: Re: Traffic Shapping Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 10:52:04 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I am looking to do the shaping on Ethernet Interfaces for a large fiber plant. I have been looking the solution by Aponet. Anyone out there used it? I believe it is what above.net uses.
-- Natambu Obleton - Network Administrator - Frontier Internet Inc. 970 385 4177 - fax: 970 385 6745 - http://www.frontier.net 777 Main St. - Suite #201 - Durango - Colorado - 81301 - USA -----Original Message----- From: Alex P. Rudnev <alex@Relcom.EU.net> To: Natambu Obleton <no@frontier.net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu <nanog@merit.edu> Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Traffic Shapping
Hmm, it depends of what do you mean as _successfully_ -:).
It works, but creates some bugs under heavy conditions.
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Natambu Obleton wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:51:16 -0600 From: Natambu Obleton <no@frontier.net> To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Traffic Shapping
Has anyone here successfully implement the traffic shaping option on a Cisco router? -- Natambu Obleton - Network Administrator - Frontier Internet Inc. 970 385 4177 - fax: 970 385 6745 - http://www.frontier.net 777 Main St. - Suite #201 - Durango - Colorado - 81301 - USA
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager) (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Ehab,
Can you please specify what platform that you are using? any why you like to do the traffic shaping on the Ethernet which is suppositly 10 Mbps?
He may well want to shape on an ethernet where he has multiple customer machines that are each paying for different amounts of bandwidth. Shaping a-la cisco is uni-directional out on an interface, and so poorly answers many needs. Supposedly the newer mechanisms they offer address all this and scale to insane bandwidths without eating all your CPU. You want to look at cisco's CEF and related tools. For now it is on the higher end boxes with the 7200 being the lowest, I think. CEF should migrate downward to the 4700 and maybe the 36xx at least. Be warned that CEF may not be ready for prime time as yet. Good luck finding a TAC guy that knows about it... Do not try it on a 720x if you have any frame relay, as CSCdj87169 *will* bite you very hard. CEF *is* in the 11.1(17)CC image, and with that above bug still unresolved, I doubt there is any relief in 11.1(18)CC due out in a few days. Now that the geeks stuff is becoming more mainstream as CC images and the CC images are publicly and prominently being promoted on CCO, more folks will be playing with the new knobs.
participants (2)
-
barton＠cent.net -
Ehab Hadi