*tap tap* is this thing on?
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this? -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
It isn't a quick flip of a switch would be my guess. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> wrote:
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
-- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
On 10/26/15 10:53 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
It isn't a quick flip of a switch would be my guess.
It's mailman - I believe there's a moderation switch to stop all messages dead in their tracks for approval. I've used it before, but don't remember the exact name of the feature in the mailman admin UI. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
That would be a lot of work to keep up with, though... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> wrote:
On 10/26/15 10:53 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
It isn't a quick flip of a switch would be my guess.
It's mailman - I believe there's a moderation switch to stop all messages dead in their tracks for approval. I've used it before, but don't remember the exact name of the feature in the mailman admin UI.
-- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Josh Luthman wrote:
It's mailman - I believe there's a moderation switch to stop all messages dead in their tracks for approval. I've used it before, but don't remember the exact name of the feature in the mailman admin UI.
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/admin/nanog/?VARHELP=general/emergency Emergency moderation
That would be a lot of work to keep up with, though...
Almost no real messages were sent for more than a day... Marcin
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
It isn't a quick flip of a switch would be my guess.
It is indeed much simpler and can even be done via a mobile device from anywhere in the world. The magic sauce: Moderate the user account being abused to post to this list. -Jim P.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Jim Popovitch <jimpop@gmail.com> wrote:
It is indeed much simpler and can even be done via a mobile device from anywhere in the world. The magic sauce: Moderate the user account being abused to post to this list.
Yep - saw ONE message on AFNOG, and that was the end of it, and I think two, or three on the Freeradius lists, and that was the end of that... Hundreds, and hundreds on NANOG however. -- Regards, Chris Knipe
On 26/10/2015 3:00 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
It isn't a quick flip of a switch would be my guess.
It is indeed much simpler and can even be done via a mobile device from anywhere in the world. The magic sauce: Moderate the user account being abused to post to this list.
-Jim P.
I've been seeing spates of these messages in other lists, including at least one I co-administer. And yes, moderation of the abused user does seem to work. As administrator I still have to kill the messages off, but Mailman makers this fairly easy. Tom Taylor
My spam filtering must be working correctly. Because, I have only seen 1 or 2...this may be the case for those with the privs. Thank You Bob Evans CTO
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
-- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
On 10/25/2015 17:56, Brielle Bruns wrote:
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
You can find people who have been convinced that NANOG is fundamentally pro-abuse because to many of them, it is revenue traffic. -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
On 10/26/15 11:21 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 10/25/2015 17:56, Brielle Bruns wrote:
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
You can find people who have been convinced that NANOG is fundamentally pro-abuse because to many of them, it is revenue traffic.
I get such mixed messages from people on this list when it comes to network abuse (esp spam). I'd almost venture to say that viewpoint is justified somewhat by the attitude of many major providers about the crap that spews forth from their or their customer's IP space. I get it that it is hard for large providers to be proactive about things going on due to the sheer size of their networks, but come on. That excuse only works for so long. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:48:59PM -0600, Brielle Bruns wrote:
I get it that it is hard for large providers to be proactive about things going on due to the sheer size of their networks, but come on. That excuse only works for so long.
1. It's not hard. It's far easier for large providers than small ones, although many of them flat-out lie and claim the opposite. 2. Whatever happened to "never build what you can't control?" If you can't stop your operation from emitting abuse, you should shut it down. Immediately. That's what professionals do. 3. Large providers pretend to be "leaders", but are among the worst in terms of actually leading by example. Just try getting a response from them via postmaster@ or abuse@. Of course these large operations should individually answer *every* message to those addresses promptly, 24x7, and initiate immediate investigation/remediation on *every* complaint. That's baseline operational competence 101, and given their enormous financial and personnel resources, it would require only a tiny amount of resources. But they don't -- and everyone else pays the price for it. ---rsk
On Oct 26, 2015, at 13:10, Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> wrote:
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
I asked a similar question myself on another list. But then after a minute's reflection, the fact that we all got 200+ messages like this on the NANOG list and not a single other message complaining about it suggests that someone did actually hit the big red moderation button promptly, and just waited until Monday to sort it out (which would not have been completely unreasonable, I think). The residual messages that tricked through after that seem likely to be nothing more than outbound queues draining. Joe
On 10/26/15 11:24 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On Oct 26, 2015, at 13:10, Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> wrote:
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
I asked a similar question myself on another list.
But then after a minute's reflection, the fact that we all got 200+ messages like this on the NANOG list and not a single other message complaining about it suggests that someone did actually hit the big red moderation button promptly, and just waited until Monday to sort it out (which would not have been completely unreasonable, I think).
The residual messages that tricked through after that seem likely to be nothing more than outbound queues draining.
Joe
I considered the same thing as you, initially. Went back and looked at the raw headers though, and the early Received headers - shows the messages were still coming in over the course of the weekend rather then just say Friday night and then it was a queue purge. My filters kicked in on Sat evening once I added something to counteract the whitelist for nanog's mails (going through nanog servers), so I'm missing alot of the later spew from Sunday. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
I have been getting these all weekend as well, and am well over 200. Pings via Twitter, and attempts to contact NANOG's upstream (SCNET) via NANOG have gone unanswered. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> wrote:
On 10/26/15 11:24 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On Oct 26, 2015, at 13:10, Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com> wrote:
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with
mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
I asked a similar question myself on another list.
But then after a minute's reflection, the fact that we all got 200+ messages like this on the NANOG list and not a single other message complaining about it suggests that someone did actually hit the big red moderation button promptly, and just waited until Monday to sort it out (which would not have been completely unreasonable, I think).
The residual messages that tricked through after that seem likely to be nothing more than outbound queues draining.
Joe
I considered the same thing as you, initially. Went back and looked at the raw headers though, and the early Received headers - shows the messages were still coming in over the course of the weekend rather then just say Friday night and then it was a queue purge.
My filters kicked in on Sat evening once I added something to counteract the whitelist for nanog's mails (going through nanog servers), so I'm missing alot of the later spew from Sunday.
-- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
participants (11)
-
Andrew Kirch -
Bob Evans -
Brielle Bruns -
Chris Knipe -
Jim Popovitch -
Joe Abley -
Josh Luthman -
Larry Sheldon -
Marcin Cieslak -
Rich Kulawiec -
Tom Taylor