RE: would you run this little script, please
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
I would be glad to run the script but I just want to verify that it was you who sent it.
darned good point, ron. <blush> yes, it was i. randy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iQCVAwUBRZqTePvCP42xMxQ5AQo1fgP9EkgUcKnjNXfpU3hgVAG0oVwVyxZZtmXq xdpUv0oDDeTBeu8QrbgU6UHRY4hWHqHVj30tUq9BQP8+knyYLImPj6ZBoVhtnEta uuTo9wUyfZovhpWJtsTNflMHaE1QlhCyLUESAJVHiEQeT0LeY7urA7N9GVWRsH/f GZii7iIpna0= =0bdG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:16:42 -1000 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
I would be glad to run the script but I just want to verify that it was you who sent it.
darned good point, ron. <blush>
yes, it was i.
randy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iQCVAwUBRZqTePvCP42xMxQ5AQo1fgP9EkgUcKnjNXfpU3hgVAG0oVwVyxZZtmXq xdpUv0oDDeTBeu8QrbgU6UHRY4hWHqHVj30tUq9BQP8+knyYLImPj6ZBoVhtnEta uuTo9wUyfZovhpWJtsTNflMHaE1QlhCyLUESAJVHiEQeT0LeY7urA7N9GVWRsH/f GZii7iIpna0= =0bdG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
And the signature even checks out.... --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD) iQCUAwUBRZqaDU7/+MPD/ExpAQLkYwP48ziUerSczFe4ncncz/qPdbnXPCyo77FX Jj7Px2w6/oDj1fgW0fP4uO5t8wYvplif9IPdPNvTKTV89LnTehrTBaV7VRo5fTwp GbxGvqeBia01iwWRCiHJ9oAMYDoYlNnxhdNJjKfIA0BVs9M9duCay+lzWYlZd95D J7Tb9Pr2Bw== =ssq5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In the spirit of "trust, but verify," I preferred to read the script. Regards Marshall On Jan 2, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:16:42 -1000 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
I would be glad to run the script but I just want to verify that it was you who sent it.
darned good point, ron. <blush>
yes, it was i.
randy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iQCVAwUBRZqTePvCP42xMxQ5AQo1fgP9EkgUcKnjNXfpU3hgVAG0oVwVyxZZtmXq xdpUv0oDDeTBeu8QrbgU6UHRY4hWHqHVj30tUq9BQP8+knyYLImPj6ZBoVhtnEta uuTo9wUyfZovhpWJtsTNflMHaE1QlhCyLUESAJVHiEQeT0LeY7urA7N9GVWRsH/f GZii7iIpna0= =0bdG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
And the signature even checks out....
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
iQCUAwUBRZqaDU7/+MPD/ExpAQLkYwP48ziUerSczFe4ncncz/qPdbnXPCyo77FX Jj7Px2w6/oDj1fgW0fP4uO5t8wYvplif9IPdPNvTKTV89LnTehrTBaV7VRo5fTwp GbxGvqeBia01iwWRCiHJ9oAMYDoYlNnxhdNJjKfIA0BVs9M9duCay+lzWYlZd95D J7Tb9Pr2Bw== =ssq5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:48:29 -0500 Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> wrote:
In the spirit of "trust, but verify," I preferred to read the script.
As did I, when Randy sent it to me earlier for testing... --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD) iQCVAwUBRZqboU7/+MPD/ExpAQL8yAQAsGy/RIiEnVk6Nc9PNu+bGHFhbcdLGJto Dke0s9YAWcKO+NuYjlnsmcriADO+Nqhs3vgdIy34BY3lM8PKiTuI1+uV9TcytFek 8e5Y4oj/n1d8Zwv37MZdmk0M03Cnn1+whKFH33b9YSeAK3yu7Lf0Flmisu8Ri82g 9gZZC8bl0zM= =/bUw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
* Randy Bush:
I would be glad to run the script but I just want to verify that it was you who sent it.
darned good point, ron. <blush>
yes, it was i.
Ah, thanks, I've saved your message and its signature. It could prove useful in the future for some kind of social engineering attack. 8-P
participants (4)
-
Florian Weimer -
Marshall Eubanks -
Randy Bush -
Steven M. Bellovin