From: MX%"randy@psg.com" 9-FEB-1997 10:01:58.40 To: MX%"nanog@merit.edu" CC: Subj: Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor Return-Path: <owner-nanog@merit.edu> Received: from merit.edu by ISDMNL.WR.USGS.GOV (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP; Sun, 09 Feb 1997 10:01:52 PST Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.5/merit-2.0) with SMTP id MAA01011; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:59:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by merit.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:55:06 -0500 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.5/merit-2.0) id MAA00936 for nanog-outgoing; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:55:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from rip.psg.com (root@rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by merit.edu (8.8.5/merit-2.0) with SMTP id MAA00931 for <nanog@merit.edu>; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:55:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by rip.psg.com id m0vtdSv-000800C; Sun, 9 Feb 97 09:55 PST (Smail3.1.29.1#1) Message-ID: <m0vtdSv-000800C@rip.psg.com> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 97 09:55 PST From: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush) To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor References: <01IF7FWWBUZMA23B63@OMEGA7.WR.USGS.GOV> <Pine.BSI.3.95q.970209124243.28620B-100000@cais2.cais.com> Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu My intention was not to generate discussion, but to raise the flag and point out the supposed deadline date and the mail address for comments. -jrf ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I think the proposed Access Tariff is a serious matter. But I think it might be better discussed elsewhere, as it is a business not an ops issue, and is likely to generate some volume for some time. randy