On 24/09/2013 18:54, Michael Brown wrote:
That is most assuredly a rewrite, it's not just your perception.
M.
Surprise surprise, that page now appears to Error 404... guess he must watch the list quite closely as it didn't take long for him to react ! ;-) Guess I should be flattered someone finds my internet rantings quoteworthy ! Would have appreciated at least a feable attempt at a citation (or at least a generic reference to the Nanog list in general).
It's back with this: "Ben quite succinctly sums it up on a nanog mailing list, “Your (the service provider) user is paying you to push packets. If that’s causing you a problem, you either need to review your commercial structure (i.e. charge people more) or your technical network design. Face the facts, what with everyone jumping on the “cloud” bandwagon, the future is only going to see you pushing more packets, not less ! So if you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen (or the xSP industry).” Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
On 24 Sep 2013, at 23:51, "Ben" <ben+nanog@list-subs.com> wrote:
On 24/09/2013 18:54, Michael Brown wrote: That is most assuredly a rewrite, it's not just your perception.
M.
Surprise surprise, that page now appears to Error 404... guess he must watch the list quite closely as it didn't take long for him to react ! ;-)
Guess I should be flattered someone finds my internet rantings quoteworthy ! Would have appreciated at least a feable attempt at a citation (or at least a generic reference to the Nanog list in general).
participants (2)
-
Ben -
Darren O'Connor