RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck)
Deepak Jain wrote: With a network boot OS for each POP, you can do version control much much more easily.
This is seriously flawed, IMHO. I'd encourage my competitors to do it: after the master image gets corrupted all it takes is a bozo tripping the right circuit breaker and the entire POP is kaput.
QOS, priority/custom queueing are all KERNEL/underlying OS functions.
This also is flawed, IMHO. What if you want to do queing or QOS based on BGP? Michel.
You buy a OSM from Cisco and you can queue and do QoS based upon bgp index or AS Scott C. McGrath On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Michel Py wrote:
Deepak Jain wrote: With a network boot OS for each POP, you can do version control much much more easily.
This is seriously flawed, IMHO. I'd encourage my competitors to do it: after the master image gets corrupted all it takes is a bozo tripping the right circuit breaker and the entire POP is kaput.
QOS, priority/custom queueing are all KERNEL/underlying OS functions.
This also is flawed, IMHO. What if you want to do queing or QOS based on BGP?
Michel.
participants (2)
-
Michel Py -
Scott McGrath