Re: Time out for a terminology check--"resolver" vs "server".
On 2/14/2010 6:10 PM, Rob Austein wrote:
At Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:02:48 -0600, Laurence F Sheldon, Jr wrote:
I thought I understood but from recent contexts here it is clear that I do not.
I thought a resolver was code in your local machine that provide hostname (FQDN?), given address; or address, given host name (with assists to build FQDN).
And I thought a "server" was a separate program, might be on the same machine, might be on another machine (might be on the local net, might be distant) that the resolver code called for information that was not in local cache.
Just what is the straight scoop?
No doubt Olafur will beat me up yet again for not having written the DNS lexicon years ago, but:
- A "resolver" is something that implements the "resolver" (ie, client) role in the DNS protocol. It might be a stub resolver, the client side of a recursive nameserver, a pure iterative resolver, ....
The defining characteristic is that it send queries (QR=0) and receives responses (QR=1).
- A "name sever" is something that implements the "nameserver" (ie, server) role in the DNS protocol. It might be an authoritative nameserver, the server side of a recursive nameserver, ....
The defining characteristic is that it receives queries (QR=0) and sends responses (QR=1).
Clear enough?
Yes--tracks with what I thought, pretty much--I was missing the clientness of the resolver code to go with the serverness of the server.
Mapping protocol definitions onto the plethora of terms used by operators in the field is left as an exercise for the reader, no sarcasm intended. DNS is an old protocol, there are an awful lot of people who think they understand it,
I am one of those is sure he understands it--which belief crumbles when I try to explain it to somebody else. and each of those people has
their own set of terms that they're comfortable using. The definitions above are what I rammed through the IETF during several rounds of standards writing, but I would be the first to admit that not everybody uses the terms the same way as I do.
DNS arcana is one of the things that somebody should document on the internet-history list while there are still people around who can do so with some authority. Thanks. -- "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
participants (1)
-
Larry Sheldon