
tried the link and entered my PacBell home DSL static IP address and was shocked to see my private name come up behind CustName field! Wrong Address though. -------------------------------------------- Whois: CustName: Martin Renschler Address: 268 Bush St San Francisco CA 94104 Country: US RegDate: 2002-08-27 Updated: 2002-08-27 NetRange: 67.116.xxx.xxx - 67.116.xxx.xxx CIDR: 67.116.xxx.xxx/29 NetName: SBC067116xxxxxx020827 NetHandle: NET-67-116-xxx-xxx-1 Parent: NET-67-112-0-0-1 NetType: Reassigned Comment: For Policy Abuse issues, contact: abuse@swbell.net For Technical issues, contact: noc@swbell.net RegDate: 2002-08-27 Updated: 2002-08-27 ----------------------------------------------------- Isn't this violating privacy rules? Geez! /Martin (private mail not representing my employer's opinion...) -----Original Message----- From: Johannes Ullrich [mailto:jullrich@euclidian.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:46 AM To: Joe; nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Arin Smack down?
I did have the same problem yesterday (Wednesday). Looks like it is working today. Maybe some leftover bug from their conversion to the new formats? Or just high load... you can try our ipinfo page, which caches whois queries. If you are lucky, someone else looked up the same ip... http://www.dshield.org/ipinfo.php?ip=64.124.168.60 -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- jullrich@euclidian.com Collaborative Intrusion Detection join http://www.dshield.org

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Martin Renschler (EWU) wrote: : :tried the link and entered my PacBell home DSL static IP address and was shocked to see my private name come up behind CustName field! Wrong Address though. : :Isn't this violating privacy rules? Geez! :/Martin :(private mail not representing my employer's opinion...) How else would one prove utilization levels to ARIN when in need of additional cidr space? And... what privacy rules? I've yet to see a privacy policy published that indicates a firm will not share with it's affiliates/parthers information necessary for providing service.

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Martin Renschler (EWU) wrote:
-snip-
NetRange: 67.116.xxx.xxx - 67.116.xxx.xxx CIDR: 67.116.xxx.xxx/29
Isn't this violating privacy rules? Geez!
Uh, well, no, AFAIK, it's a common practice (and a good idea, and depending on your RR, possibly a requirement) to SWIP allocations/assignments of /29 or larger. They're just following BCP. -j

--snip--
tried the link and entered my PacBell home DSL static IP address and
was
shocked to see my private name come up behind CustName field! Wrong Address though.
When registering residential customers, ARIN recommends the phrase "Private Residence" for the address. ISPs should provide the person's name, city, state, postal code and country to complement the private residence designation. FYI. -Patrick -- Patrick Muldoon, Network/Software Engineer INOC, LLC doon@inoc.net Calm down -- it's only ones and zeroes.
participants (6)
-
Brian Wallingford
-
Harsha Narayan
-
Jonathan Disher
-
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
-
Martin Renschler (EWU)
-
Patrick Muldoon