fix the edge (was Re: 1/8 and 27/8 allocated to APNIC)
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> wrote:
I thought there was some other group that had been squatting in 1/8, something about radio and peer to peer...but not AnoNet (at least that name was totally unfamiliar)...but this was all I could find with a quick google.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnoNet#Scaling oh, the irony. good thing privacy costs too much for the majority of internet users. on a serious note, who cares? Resolution to the 1/8 allocation "mess" seems on par with freeing up IP stacks from excluding 240/4, but by the time any of this is resolved, perhaps residential users on att dsl/etc might just have working IP6CP, or will have switched to comcast by then. -Tk
Anton Kapela wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> wrote:
I thought there was some other group that had been squatting in 1/8, something about radio and peer to peer...but not AnoNet (at least that name was totally unfamiliar)...but this was all I could find with a quick google.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnoNet#Scaling
oh, the irony. good thing privacy costs too much for the majority of internet users.
on a serious note, who cares? Resolution to the 1/8 allocation "mess" seems on par with freeing up IP stacks from excluding 240/4, but by the time any of this is resolved, perhaps residential users on att dsl/etc might just have working IP6CP, or will have switched to comcast by then.
It's way lower than 240/4 one doesn't have to patch the kernel on a billion devices.
-Tk
participants (2)
-
Anton Kapela -
Joel Jaeggli