On 9/5/2013 1:20 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:

On 9/4/2013 11:56 PM, Peter Kristolaitis wrote:

...

On 9/5/2013 12:17 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

...

...

There's still the much more minor point that when I tried to "self serve" I ended up at a blank page on the Yahoo! web site, hopefully they will figure that out as well. I'm continually amazed at the number of web designers that don't test

On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:47:40 -0500, Leo Bicknell said: their pages with NoScript enabled. Just sayin'.

NoScript? That's some kind of antimalvirus thingy for Internet Explorer, right? I think I read something about that in the Website Design For Dimwits in 24 Hours book... ;)

I would not use IE on a bet, but I do use NoScript as well as several other defensive weapons.

I probably do not give a big rats patotie what your site offers--I know it won't be good.

I assume that you intended this for the list and not me directly, and that you haven't yet got around to reading "Things To Experience On The Internet, Volume 1: Sarcasm". :) In case it wasn't abundantly clear, my post was a shot at what often passes for "web developer" these days. I had hoped that "antimalvirus" would have been an indication that it was a joke, but I guess my sarcasm is rusty... I would hope that no one on this list is ignorant of both the failings of IE and of the existence of NoScript.