Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation

I've heard of this from others as well. It seems to be technically feasible, but I am curious about the social aspect: would ISPs actually do this? Would customer's find it acceptable? (given it still locks them to an ISP, now to two of them.) In fact, this is technically feasible right now with IPv4. Does anyone know of a pair of ISPs doing this? John

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:53:12 CDT, John Dupuy said:
In fact, this is technically feasible right now with IPv4. Does anyone know of a pair of ISPs doing this?
"technically feasible" and "business case reasonable" are two different things. Under what conditions does this sort of cooperation with a competitor make sense?

On 24-Oct-2005, at 11:21, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
As a customer, I would prefer to multi-home between ISPs who rarely talk to each other rather than those who are in collusion. From a technical perspective I want the operator-induced failures in each ISP to be as independent as possible; from the business perspective I want them both to fight for my money. Joe
participants (4)
-
Joe Abley
-
Joe Maimon
-
John Dupuy
-
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu