missing commands in Cisco IOS
So I am trying to help a downstream ISP get BGP up and running. It seems that prefix-list and peer shutdown functions don't exist on there rev. The strange thing is that their rev is newer than mine. me 7206 IOS 11.1-19(CC) them 3640 c3640-i-mz.112-18.P is the flash image So what ver should they tell there vendor to get them ??
The CC tree contains things that aren't in the other trees. Specifically it includes port adapter code. The P (provider) image doesn't contain other things you'd expect in the desktop and enterprise versions. I love 11.1(31)CC E
So I am trying to help a downstream ISP get BGP up and running. It seems that prefix-list and peer shutdown functions don't exist on there rev.
The strange thing is that their rev is newer than mine.
me 7206 IOS 11.1-19(CC)
them 3640 c3640-i-mz.112-18.P is the flash image
So what ver should they tell there vendor to get them ??
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 01:11:26PM -0700, John M. Brown wrote:
So I am trying to help a downstream ISP get BGP up and running. It seems that prefix-list and peer shutdown functions don't exist on there rev.
The strange thing is that their rev is newer than mine.
me 7206 IOS 11.1-19(CC)
"Geek train" - target'et at service providers.
them 3640 c3640-i-mz.112-18.P is the flash image
So what ver should they tell there vendor to get them ??
12.0 mainline /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, John M. Brown wrote:
So I am trying to help a downstream ISP get BGP up and running. It seems that prefix-list and peer shutdown functions don't exist on there rev.
The strange thing is that their rev is newer than mine.
me 7206 IOS 11.1-19(CC)
them 3640 c3640-i-mz.112-18.P is the flash image
Those are from totally different trains, thus different feature sets. 11.1CC has other features Cisco says you have to use 12.0 to get. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| Spammers will be winnuked or System Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes Atlantic Net | to get the job done. _________http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key__________
11.2P is not a superset of 11.1CC. Check out the IOS roadmap for a depiction of the evolution of IOS: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/620/roadmap.shtml The first place 11.2 and 11.1CC come together is 12.0. Since the commands you're looking for appear to be added in 11.1CC, your downstream probably needs to run 12.0. S | | Stephen Sprunk, K5SSS, CCIE #3723 :|: :|: NSA, Network Consulting Engineer :|||: :|||: 14875 Landmark Blvd #400; Dallas, TX .:|||||||:..:|||||||:. Pager: 800-365-4578 / 800-901-6078 C I S C O S Y S T E M S Email: ssprunk@cisco.com ----- Original Message ----- From: John M. Brown To: nanog@merit.edu Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 14:11 Subject: missing commands in Cisco IOS So I am trying to help a downstream ISP get BGP up and running. It seems that prefix-list and peer shutdown functions don't exist on there rev. The strange thing is that their rev is newer than mine. me 7206 IOS 11.1-19(CC) them 3640 c3640-i-mz.112-18.P is the flash image So what ver should they tell there vendor to get them ??
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
11.2P is not a superset of 11.1CC. Check out the IOS roadmap for a depiction of the evolution of IOS:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/620/roadmap.shtml
The first place 11.2 and 11.1CC come together is 12.0. Since the commands you're looking for appear to be added in 11.1CC, your downstream probably needs to run 12.0.
I found that some features (namely, MBGP) are not moved from the 11.1CC train to the main 12.0 train; and you will need 12.0T for them. :-) -Andy (When will software/hardware implementations be fast enough to build an [I|routing]OS that is modular - so you can add the features you want without having to load all the crap you will never need? The question itself may be moot, since no technical support group could provide service for such a wide variety of installed systems... *sigh*. ) -- Andy McConnell amcconnell@acm.org Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.
Since John was asking about a feature in 11.1(19)CC, it is safe to say it will be in 12.0. Per the IOS Roadmap, you can see that 11.1(19)CC was the last point that 11.1CC features were synchronized into 12.0(1). 11.1(20)CC to 11.1(22)CC was synchronized into 12.0(3)T and 12.0(2)S. Any features added to 11.1CC after that point separately went into 12.0T and/or 12.0S (depending on a variety of factors). You think this system makes it tough to figure out where a feature is? Imagine trying to manage a modular version of IOS where each component is a different version (with potentially different features) and users can add and remove parts of the OS at their whim. The development challenges of such a system probably have more to do with system architecture and component rewrites vs. any hardware limitations. S | | Stephen Sprunk, K5SSS, CCIE #3723 :|: :|: NSA, Network Consulting Engineer :|||: :|||: 14875 Landmark Blvd #400; Dallas, TX .:|||||||:..:|||||||:. Pager: 800-365-4578 / 800-901-6078 C I S C O S Y S T E M S Email: ssprunk@cisco.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy McConnell To: Stephen Sprunk Cc: John M. Brown ; nanog@merit.edu Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 13:37 Subject: Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS I found that some features (namely, MBGP) are not moved from the 11.1CC train to the main 12.0 train; and you will need 12.0T for them. :-) -Andy (When will software/hardware implementations be fast enough to build an [I|routing]OS that is modular - so you can add the features you want without having to load all the crap you will never need? The question itself may be moot, since no technical support group could provide service for such a wide variety of installed systems... *sigh*. ) -- Andy McConnell amcconnell@acm.org Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:51:37 -0600 "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk@cisco.com> wrote:
Imagine trying to manage a modular version of IOS where each component is a different version (with potentially different features) and users can add and remove parts of the OS at their whim. The development challenges of such a system probably have more to do with system architecture and component rewrites vs. any hardware limitations.
So there is some justification for cisco's insane pricing after all!!! -- Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking neil@DOMINO.ORG
participants (7)
-
Andy McConnell -
Ehud Gavron -
Jesper Skriver -
jlewis＠lewis.org -
John M. Brown -
Neil J. McRae -
Stephen Sprunk