Re: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ...
22 May
2001
22 May
'01
1:49 p.m.
On 5/21/2001 at 14:18:15 -0700, Robert Raszuk said:
not be interested. The issue here is that Cisco will tend to add IGP routes to the default table, not the VPN table. Bad things ensue.
What ... ? For protocols that have been vrf aware routes go into vrfs and not global RIB.
That's the problem: not all the IGP's (specifically, not ours) are aware, and handling for a non-aware IGP on a VRF interface is more dangerous than one might expect. -Dave
8634
Age (days ago)
8634
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Dave Israel