We're seeing bad throughput via http from both IP addresses we resolve for this host (207.46.235.150 and 207.46.235.162). Connections from three unrelated AS all with T1 or better are giving throughput in tests with wget around 28-64Kbps). Each has a unqiue path to MS. One of our clients reports that from his AT&T cable modem, he gets 1.5Mbps+ for the same file at the same time. Perhaps they're caching the files? (not sure how comfortable I'd be with my provider caching something important like an OS update). Our outbound path to MS currently traverses AT&T fwiw. A test to ftp.microsoft.com when this was first reported to us last night yielded closer to 750Kbps peak and slowly climbing when it completed, so this doesn't look like a congestion issue AFAICT. Traceroutes to MS look quite good, no loss and low latency (all under 100ms) as far as they go. Tests to other sites from all three AS I checked looked significantly better by a factor of 20-50; I found no evidence of connectivity issues anywhere I checked except MS. Copies of the test results and traceroutes were sent to the listed MS contacts on jared's noc list. No auto-ack or bounces yet.... I made one last test (using IE instead of wget), and things seem slightly improved, yielding an initial 800kbps that quickly dropped to 300 dropped steadily to a final 112kbps on a 17MB file. Repeating the wget test also showed some improvement, but not as much (round robin makes this tough to accurately guage). Mike
Don't know the history of this input but MS is in the process of an auto security update for ALL XP machines worldwide. Might have something to do with this behavior. On a side note, it kills ALL E-mail attachments (MS files et al) and significant web content. Security vulnerability in XP. As I told the MS agent I talked to, kind of makes Windows useless. :) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q265424 Best regards, _________________________ Alan Rowland Also an ATT BI customer. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Lewinski Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:21 AM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: FYI: download.microsoft.com problem We're seeing bad throughput via http from both IP addresses we resolve for this host (207.46.235.150 and 207.46.235.162). Connections from three unrelated AS all with T1 or better are giving throughput in tests with wget around 28-64Kbps). Each has a unqiue path to MS. One of our clients reports that from his AT&T cable modem, he gets 1.5Mbps+ for the same file at the same time. Perhaps they're caching the files? (not sure how comfortable I'd be with my provider caching something important like an OS update). Our outbound path to MS currently traverses AT&T fwiw. A test to ftp.microsoft.com when this was first reported to us last night yielded closer to 750Kbps peak and slowly climbing when it completed, so this doesn't look like a congestion issue AFAICT. Traceroutes to MS look quite good, no loss and low latency (all under 100ms) as far as they go. Tests to other sites from all three AS I checked looked significantly better by a factor of 20-50; I found no evidence of connectivity issues anywhere I checked except MS. Copies of the test results and traceroutes were sent to the listed MS contacts on jared's noc list. No auto-ack or bounces yet.... I made one last test (using IE instead of wget), and things seem slightly improved, yielding an initial 800kbps that quickly dropped to 300 dropped steadily to a final 112kbps on a 17MB file. Repeating the wget test also showed some improvement, but not as much (round robin makes this tough to accurately guage). Mike
I think you need to read a little more carefully and also see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262631 Which is linked to the article you mention. The only real downside is that you can't change the "level-1" list at all unless you use Outlook 2K in and Exchange server environment, with your mail delivered to an Exchange mailbox, then it can be changed by and admin. IMHO all the file extensions that I see on the "Level-1" list belong there anyway. If you need to e-mail one of those files for some reason (ie, sharing development code or whatever), just zip it and then send it.... Now back to more operational content......? /Alex Kiwerski -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Al Rowland Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:12 AM To: 'Mike Lewinski'; nanog@merit.edu Subject: RE: download.microsoft.com problem Don't know the history of this input but MS is in the process of an auto security update for ALL XP machines worldwide. Might have something to do with this behavior. On a side note, it kills ALL E-mail attachments (MS files et al) and significant web content. Security vulnerability in XP. As I told the MS agent I talked to, kind of makes Windows useless. :) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q265424 Best regards, _________________________ Alan Rowland Also an ATT BI customer.
participants (3)
-
Al Rowland -
Alexander Kiwerski -
Mike Lewinski