It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after cw's peer the next hop after cw's peer. I just tried the trace again and it seems better. Cw seems to be handing off to att at a different point in santaclara now not sanfrancisco which seemed to help. Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine up tntil one hop after cw ended. On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, IP-GNOC wrote:
No issues to report, probably a return path issue. It'd be easier to confirm that with a traceroute showing the latency. And you will get a timely response from noc@cw.net, which is where this email belongs.
Regards, Mark Kasten Cable & Wireless
Scott Granados wrote:
Anyone else seeing an issue between cw and att somewhere near sf it looks like.
I go from 4 ms, at the point tagged as the peer between cw and att and 1400 ms once I land on att.
THanks
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:19:58PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after cw's peer the next hop after cw's peer.
I just tried the trace again and it seems better.
Cw seems to be handing off to att at a different point in santaclara now not sanfrancisco which seemed to help. Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine up tntil one hop after cw ended.
route-server.ip.att.net When in doubt, try looking at the reverse path. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:19:58PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after cw's
Is there a good plac for a listing of the publically available route-servers? I only knew of the oregon one. Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net> To: "Scott Granados" <scott@wworks.net> Cc: <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:35 PM Subject: Re: cw to att? issue? peer
the next hop after cw's peer.
I just tried the trace again and it seems better.
Cw seems to be handing off to att at a different point in santaclara now not sanfrancisco which seemed to help. Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine up tntil one hop after cw ended.
route-server.ip.att.net
When in doubt, try looking at the reverse path.
-- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
Is there a good plac for a listing of the publically available route-servers? I only knew of the oregon one.
http://www.traceroute.org/#Route Servers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
www.traceroute.org should have some but that site hasn't been updated in ages.. These are *some* that I know including oregon: route-views.oregon-ix.net route-views2.oregon-ix.net route-server.gt.ca route-server.ip.att.net route-server.cw.net route-server.bbnplanet.net hope it helps.. -hc On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
Is there a good plac for a listing of the publically available route-servers? I only knew of the oregon one.
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net> To: "Scott Granados" <scott@wworks.net> Cc: <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:35 PM Subject: Re: cw to att? issue?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:19:58PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after cw's
peer
the next hop after cw's peer.
I just tried the trace again and it seems better.
Cw seems to be handing off to att at a different point in santaclara now not sanfrancisco which seemed to help. Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine up tntil one hop after cw ended.
route-server.ip.att.net
When in doubt, try looking at the reverse path.
-- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
I don't agree, I update the links at least once a month and more frequently if I get feedback from the community. Thomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Haesu" <haesu@towardex.com> To: "Scott Granados" <scott@wworks.net> Cc: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>; <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:51 AM Subject: Re: cw to att? issue?
www.traceroute.org should have some but that site hasn't been updated in ages..
These are *some* that I know including oregon:
route-views.oregon-ix.net route-views2.oregon-ix.net route-server.gt.ca route-server.ip.att.net route-server.cw.net route-server.bbnplanet.net
hope it helps..
-hc
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
Is there a good plac for a listing of the publically available route-servers? I only knew of the oregon one.
Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net> To: "Scott Granados" <scott@wworks.net> Cc: <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:35 PM Subject: Re: cw to att? issue?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:19:58PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after
cw's
peer
the next hop after cw's peer.
I just tried the trace again and it seems better.
Cw seems to be handing off to att at a different point in santaclara now not sanfrancisco which seemed to help. Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine up tntil one hop after cw ended.
route-server.ip.att.net
When in doubt, try looking at the reverse path.
-- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Hi, Scott. ] Is there a good plac for a listing of the publically available ] route-servers? I only knew of the oregon one. I keep a list in the Secure BGP Template: <http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bgp-template.html> I do this so that I don't forget them. :) Updates and comments are always welcome! Thanks, Rob. -- Rob Thomas http://www.cymru.com ASSERT(coffee != empty);
participants (6)
-
Haesu -
jlewis＠lewis.org -
Richard A Steenbergen -
Rob Thomas -
Scott Granados -
Thomas Kernen