for the past few hours, we've been seeing certain root servers intermittently claiming that certain names don't exist, and then changing their mind a few minutes later. anyone else seeing this? did i miss an announcement of problems? -matthew kaufman matthew@scruz.net
We have been seeing this all day today and with negatives caching, it's a big problem. So maybe it's not our named...
for the past few hours, we've been seeing certain root servers intermittently claiming that certain names don't exist, and then changing their mind a few minutes later.
anyone else seeing this? did i miss an announcement of problems?
-matthew kaufman matthew@scruz.net
While I am not at liberty at this time to release the documentation in my hands as the invidual who wrote it would like to try and get a patch available before releasing his advisory. Put simply, he has 'discovered', documented, and made available his methods, a method to forge DNS information in a way that would/could cause the errors you are seeing in the root name servers. The following is an excerpt that I don't think he'll get pissed about if I release: Because of the severity of the problem at hand, no source code will be made available. However, I have setup a service that you can use to test your dns servers to see if they are vulnerable. I have setup certain domain names off the sventech.com domain which when queried will send additional information in the packet to attempt to get bind to cache. Here is a list of the domain names and the information they try to cache: begin.dns.sventech.com Will load a domain name of this.is.a.test.domain with an A record of 1.2.3.4 and a MX record of mail.test.domain with a priority of 10 for test.domain. It will also give it a NS record that points to ns.test.domain which has an IP address of 4.3.2.1 add.dns.sventech.com This will add an A record of 3.1.33.7 to this.is.a.test.domain mx.dns.sventech.com This will add an MX record of mail.competitor.domain to test.domain with a priority of 5 On Thu, 13 Feb 1997, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
for the past few hours, we've been seeing certain root servers intermittently claiming that certain names don't exist, and then changing their mind a few minutes later.
anyone else seeing this? did i miss an announcement of problems?
-matthew kaufman matthew@scruz.net
[-] Brett L. Hawn (blh @ nol dot net) [-] [-] Networks On-Line - Houston, Texas [-] [-] 713-467-7100 [-]
We have also been experiencing this problem since this morning. We have a call into the NIC, but have yet to receive a response. We have also notice a fairly significant reduction in traffic and are assuming it may be related. At least packet loss is a little better:-) Jim
for the past few hours, we've been seeing certain root servers intermittently claiming that certain names don't exist, and then changing their mind a few minutes later.
anyone else seeing this? did i miss an announcement of problems?
-matthew kaufman matthew@scruz.net
participants (4)
-
Brett L. Hawn
-
Jim Van Baalen
-
jon@branch.net
-
matthew@scruz.net