user-relative names - was:[Re: Yahoo and IPv6]
--- dot@dotat.at wrote: Or perhaps user-relative names. http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/uia-osdi.pdf -------------------------------------------------- What about privacy concerns; stopping your every move being tracked through the personal name attached to all of your devices? Did I miss something in the paper? scott
On May 17, 2011 6:26 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:04:19 PDT, Scott Weeks said:
What about privacy concerns
"Privacy is dead. Get used to it." -- Scott McNeely
Forget that attitude, Valdis. Just because privacy is blown at one level doesn't mean you give it away at every other one. We establish the framework for recovering privacy and make progress step by step, wherever we can. Someday we'll get it all back under control. Scott
On May 17, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
On May 17, 2011 6:26 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:04:19 PDT, Scott Weeks said:
What about privacy concerns
"Privacy is dead. Get used to it." -- Scott McNeely
Forget that attitude, Valdis. Just because privacy is blown at one level doesn't mean you give it away at every other one. We establish the framework for recovering privacy and make progress step by step, wherever we can. Someday we'll get it all back under control.
if you put something in the dns you do so because you want to discovered. scoping the nameservers such that they only express certain certain resource records to queriers in a particular scope is fairly straight forward.
Scott
participants (4)
-
Joel Jaeggli -
Scott Brim -
Scott Weeks -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu