asymmetric routing rearing its ugly head?? Brian On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Charles Gucker wrote:

Strange, I'm not seeing the loss out to that atm interface.

7 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.9.26) 27.931 ms 36.213 ms 36.588 ms 8 307.at-2-1-0.XR1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.27.153) 37.648 ms 36.526 ms 35.544 ms 9 0.so-2-2-0.XL1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.19.29) 35.122 ms 33.398 ms 32.955 ms 10 0.so-1-0-0.TL1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.137) 32.532 ms 32.520 ms 32.670 ms 11 0.SO-1-1-0.TL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.78) 96.295 ms 98.289 ms 99.398 ms 12 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.55.105) 102.508 ms 105.129 ms 104.808 ms 13 POS1-0.XR1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.138) 104.300 ms 103.369 ms 103.271 ms 14 193.ATM7-0.GW5.SJC2.ALTER.NET (146.188.144.25) 106.969 ms * 101.883 ms

Charles Gucker Cablevision

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:44:27PM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:

...

Greetings,

For the last two days I've seen massive delays around the following hops: Does anyone have any thoughts on what is going on?

9 15 ms 31 ms 32 ms 0.so-0-3-0.XL1.LAX9.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.2] 10 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms 0.so-1-0-0.TL1.LAX9.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.142] 11 47 ms 31 ms 47 ms 0.so-4-0-0.TL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.98] 12 1109 ms 1360 ms 1547 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SJC2.ALTER.NET [152.63.55.105] 13 2110 ms 2093 ms 2016 ms POS1-0.XR1.SJC2.ALTER.NET [152.63.56.138] 14 1906 ms 1766 ms 2046 ms 193.ATM7-0.GW5.SJC2.ALTER.NET [146.188.144.25]

Regards, Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO Broadband Laboratories http://www.bblabs.com