d.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707122342300.29164@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4696AB85.1030407@inoc.net

<Pine.LNX.4.64.0707130039220.29164@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4696B5CE.2080506@psg.com> Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu Precedence: bulk Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu X-Loop: nanog X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mozart.merit.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090202.4696C007.0102:SCGAP167720,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=198.108.1.26, so=2006-09-22 03:48:54, dmn=5.3.14/2007-05-31 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: NonJunk X-UID: 42 On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Randy Bush wrote:

sell us a merlin-like hack to deal with it until the ieee gets off its butt.

I hope everybody tells their vendors that 100GE is of high importance for them. The IEEE HSSG seem to be bogged down by 40GE vs 100GE right now with some voicing very strongly that 40GE should be included together with 100GE goal, mostly from the fibre channel and server folks. If you want 100GE by 2009-2010, please read up at <http://www.ieee802.org/3/hssg/public/index.html> and voice your opinion either on the email list or via your vendors. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se