NANOG is supposed to be for North American Network Operators - can't the owner remove posting privileges for Hank (since he meets neither of the criteria)? Take the IAHC-apologist crap elsewhere Hank. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 08:19:27AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:

At 02:04 PM 5/17/98 -0500, Jim Fleming wrote:

NANOG is supposed to be be a "controlled" list - can't the owner remove posting privs for Jim? -Hank

...

NANOG is supported by Merit and Merit is supported by the NSF and the NSF is supported by the U.S. Government and the U.S. Government is supported by U.S. taxpayers...

This makes NANOG conversations about Internet Governance topics subject to the Ex-Parte rules of the U.S. Government.

I will try to include the right CCs so that the NTIA's web site can be up to date.

http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/

- Jim Fleming Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM