RE: Faster 'Net growth rate raises fears about routers
From the article:
<quote> "Half of the companies that are multihomed should have gotten better service from their providers," says Patrik Faltstrom, a Cisco engineer and co-chair of the IETF's Applications Area. "ISPs haven't done a good enough job explaining to their customers that they don't need to multihome." </quote>
From what I just went through (DSLnetworks v Covad), this is straight bulldust. Had I been properly multi-homed, MHSC would NOT have been down for 5 weeks.
-----Original Message----- From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:hank@att.net.il] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 4:16 AM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Faster 'Net growth rate raises fears about routers
I have a feeling this one may start another very large NANOG thread:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0402routing.html
-Hank
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote: > From what I just went through (DSLnetworks v Covad), this is straight > bulldust. Had I been properly multi-homed, MHSC would NOT have been down for > 5 weeks. Patrik said ISPs, not IAPs. -Bill
participants (2)
-
Bill Woodcock
-
Roeland Meyer