Why do I even bother? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:08:22 -0500 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@soloth.lewis.org> To: jlewis@lewis.org Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details The original message was received at Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:08:18 -0500 from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <paul@vix.com> (reason: 553 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [69.28.69.2] blocked using reject-all.vix.com; reason / created) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to sa.vix.com.:
RCPT To:<paul@vix.com> <<< 553 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [69.28.69.2] blocked using reject-all.vix.com; reason / created 550 5.1.1 <paul@vix.com>... User unknown
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:09:58PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <paul@vix.com> (reason: 553 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [69.28.69.2] blocked using reject-all.vix.com; reason / created)
----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to sa.vix.com.:
RCPT To:<paul@vix.com> <<< 553 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [69.28.69.2] blocked using reject-all.vix.com; reason / created 550 5.1.1 <paul@vix.com>... User unknown
Well... reject-all.vix.com. 3600 IN NS ns.lah1.vix.com. reject-all.vix.com. 3600 IN NS ns.sql1.vix.com. dig any 2.0.0.127.reject-all.vix.com @ns.sql1.vix.com gives status: REFUSED and as ns.lah1.vix.com does alike all authorative nameservers for this zone are some kind of hmm 'unreachable' thus resulting in a SERVFAIL from your recursive nameserver. It seems like your MTA is not very gracious to SERVFAILs from DNSRBLs. Stefan, Hosthamster -- "Portability is for people who cannot write new programs." - Linus Torvalds, 1992
On 1-Feb-2007, at 06:50, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Well... reject-all.vix.com. 3600 IN NS ns.lah1.vix.com. reject-all.vix.com. 3600 IN NS ns.sql1.vix.com.
dig any 2.0.0.127.reject-all.vix.com @ns.sql1.vix.com gives status: REFUSED and as ns.lah1.vix.com does alike all authorative nameservers for this zone are some kind of hmm 'unreachable' thus resulting in a SERVFAIL from your recursive nameserver. It seems like your MTA is not very gracious to SERVFAILs from DNSRBLs.
... or alternatively, that this is a private DNSRBL which has access restrictions. Joe
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:21:19AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
... or alternatively, that this is a private DNSRBL which has access restrictions.
Yeah i was missing the "while talking to sa.vix.com" part in Jon's mail, sorry for the confusion. Stefan -- I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer. - Zaphod Beeblebrox, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
jlewis@lewis.org (Jon Lewis) writes:
Why do I even bother?
(reason: 553 5.7.1 Service unavailable; \ Client host [69.28.69.2] blocked using reject-all.vix.com; \ reason / created)
here's what you ran into. *.69.28.69.reject-all.vix.com. 1800 IN TXT "reason" "sa.vix.com" \ "watchmaillog" "sqlgrey" \ "return_mail_1@hospitalitytoolkitemail.com" "->" \ "jkensmoe1@cix.net" \ "at" "2006-11-09" "17:55:26.932919" obviously, autoblackholing /24's based on a single greylist failure (mail not retried within 24 hours after receiving the initial 4XX) was over the top. i've disabled that part of the inbound processing robotics, and i've removed your /24 from the list. -- Paul Vixie
participants (4)
-
Joe Abley -
Jon Lewis -
Paul Vixie -
Stefan Schmidt