Hi, Can someone suggest a few good POP3 mail servers on Microsoft NT server Version 4 ? Either freeware or commercial products are fine. Thanks a lot. Regards, Sung S. Tien tien@vnet.ibm.com
Sendmail w/pop3 from metainfo.com Greetings, Alex. On Thu, 12 Feb 1998 tien@VNET.IBM.COM wrote:
Hi, Can someone suggest a few good POP3 mail servers on Microsoft NT server Version 4 ? Either freeware or commercial products are fine. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Sung S. Tien tien@vnet.ibm.com
Metainfo's NT port of Sendmail is funky. (www.metainfo.com) Of course, a robust NT port of qmail would be nicer... :) -=asr On Thu, 12 Feb 1998 tien@VNET.IBM.COM wrote:
Hi, Can someone suggest a few good POP3 mail servers on Microsoft NT server Version 4 ? Either freeware or commercial products are fine. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Sung S. Tien tien@vnet.ibm.com
On Thu, Feb 12, 1998 at 09:48:08PM -0500, Adam Rothschild wrote:
Metainfo's NT port of Sendmail is funky. (www.metainfo.com)
Wouldn't that qualify as a big resource-hogging security hole running on top of another big resource-hogging security hole? :) -- Steven J. Sobol, Tech Support - The NACS.NET Collective ** sjsobol@nacs.net We are NACS of BORG. Pantek Internet Services has been assimilated.
On Thu, Feb 12, 1998 at 09:48:08PM -0500, Adam Rothschild wrote:
Metainfo's NT port of Sendmail is funky. (www.metainfo.com)
Wouldn't that qualify as a big resource-hogging security hole running on top of another big resource-hogging security hole? :)
Of course it would. :) I was just trying to suggest a product of value, within his constraints. If I were in his footsteps, and if at all practical, I would assemble a Linux or BSD box and install qmail. -=asr
On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Adam Rothschild wrote:
Metainfo's NT port of Sendmail is funky. (www.metainfo.com)
Wouldn't that qualify as a big resource-hogging security hole running on top of another big resource-hogging security hole? :)
I was just trying to suggest a product of value, within his constraints.
You folks are on the wrong list. You should send a message saying subscribe to inet-access@earth.com to susbcribe to a mailinglist intended for ISP discussions. The NANOG list is not for ISPs. It is for network operators, i.e. folks who operate networks of interconnected routers. If the topic of interest has anything to do with servers or dialup access then it is an ISP topic which will be more welcome on inet-access than on the NANOG list. -- Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael@memra.com
participants (5)
-
Adam Rothschild -
Ing. Alejandro Perea Mejia -
Michael Dillon -
Steve Sobol -
tien＠VNET.IBM.COM