Hi Daniel and all, Yes, multiple fiber in multiple conduits, traveling multiple paths is the best way to insure something's going to have connectivity. Ring topology is what I've seen mostly for best protection, if something goes down, restoration takes milliseconds and is automatic. Worst case, is some contractor digs up the place where your fiber enters your building and severs everything....not much you can do about that kind of outage. At 20:41 6/16/02 +0200, you wrote:
Hi blitz,
I think that you talk about multiple outage in the Telefonica Network in Spain cause by sabotage. (48 fibers in 4 points at the same time)
I see ok the interest of the ministry, is necessary to assure that outages don't affect to the national infraestruture.
In our case we build our network over diverse companys with diverse path in their fiber network. I see ok, that all companys that operate basic services do it and they will have backup and emergency plans.
Regards, Daniel Intelideas
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, blitz wrote:
The Spanish ministry of science and technology has asked telecommunications companies to activate a backup plan in the case of such emergencies in future.
Spare fibers in the same duct ;-?
Doesn't sound like it would be much protection from "backhoe fade"...heh
## On 2002-06-16 15:04 -0400 blitz typed: b> b> b> Hi Daniel and all, b> Yes, multiple fiber in multiple conduits, traveling multiple paths is the b> best way to insure something's going to have connectivity. b> Ring topology is what I've seen mostly for best protection, if something b> goes down, restoration takes milliseconds and is automatic.
Worst case, is b> some contractor digs up the place where your fiber enters your building and b> severs everything....not much you can do about that kind of outage.
Why not? - IMHO If you already get diverse carriers splitting them between say the front and the back of the building shouldn't be that hard -- Rafi
participants (3)
-
blitz
-
James
-
Rafi Sadowsky