Anyone else seeing an issue between cw and att somewhere near sf it looks like. I go from 4 ms, at the point tagged as the peer between cw and att and 1400 ms once I land on att. THanks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 AT&T has been having several issues over the past few days, especially with their broadband unit on the west coast to alot of central california locations where latency jumps from 20ms to 1100ms nightly. This just started a few days ago. I opened a ticket (as a customer) to their broadband division but never heard back. So, I'm not suprised. Who knows what's going on over there. It's getting pretty annoying though. Scott Granados wrote: | Anyone else seeing an issue between cw and att somewhere near sf it looks | like. | | I go from 4 ms, at the point tagged as the peer between cw and att and | 1400 ms once I land on att. | | THanks | | | | - -- Thanks, Shon Elliott Systems Engineer; OptiGate Networks, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+b6qIt49dIzGDssARAjKpAJ0XppvkSeXK3iy9+qAieTL4wWT9vACdGkGy auVFi/gTFY3Ffg1P8j9ojKs= =nUR6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
No issues to report, probably a return path issue. It'd be easier to confirm that with a traceroute showing the latency. And you will get a timely response from noc@cw.net, which is where this email belongs. Regards, Mark Kasten Cable & Wireless Scott Granados wrote:
Anyone else seeing an issue between cw and att somewhere near sf it looks like.
I go from 4 ms, at the point tagged as the peer between cw and att and 1400 ms once I land on att.
THanks
participants (3)
-
Mark Kasten -
Scott Granados -
Shon Elliott