In article <hot.mailing-lists.nanog-199609051951.PAA08990@netaxs.com>, Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com> wrote:

The bigger problem (the one I was thinking about) would be someone putting a host on 192.41.177.x or 192.157.69.x or 198.32.136.x or ...

With something like cisco's Local Director you could quite easily serve a whole web farm out of a single IP. Well, at least when HTTP/1.1 style Host: or full-url GET type requests become more prevalent, otherwise you'd be stuck with a single virtual host. Technically it's a router :) Dean