Tri-GigE or OC-48 For Milwaukee > Chicago Network
Dear List: We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet Services to Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public peering exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple Cisco 12,000 series routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and then transport all of the data back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then connect those gigabit Ethernet lines into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee Datacenter) or bring the data back on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in Milwaukee to break up the OC-48? Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What would you go with? ---------------------- Nick Catalano Chief Strategy Officer Nozone, Inc Services from the next generation - Nozone, Inc
You already asked these questions in another fora and received your answers there. Please resist the cycle of multiple crosspostings.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear List:
We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet Services to = Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral = Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public = peering exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple = Cisco 12,000 series routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and = then transport all of the data back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via = Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then connect those gigabit Ethernet lines = into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee Datacenter) or bring the data back = on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in Milwaukee to break up the = OC-48?
Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What would you go with? ---------------------- Nick Catalano Chief Strategy Officer Nozone, Inc
Services from the next generation - Nozone, Inc
------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Dear List:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet = Services=20 to Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral=20 Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public = peering=20 exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple Cisco = 12,000 series=20 routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and then transport all of = the data=20 back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then = connect=20 those gigabit Ethernet lines into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee = Datacenter) or=20 bring the data back on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in = Milwaukee to=20 break up the OC-48?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What = would you go=20 with?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>----------------------<BR>Nick Catalano<BR>Chief = Strategy=20 Officer<BR>Nozone, Inc</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Services from the next generation - Nozone,=20 Inc</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0--
participants (2)
-
bmanning＠vacation.karoshi.com -
Nick Catalano