Indeed -- it apears to have flaked out a bit this (IETF) week. :-) Date Prefixes CIDR Aggregated 04-11-06 199323 129829 05-11-06 199330 129854 06-11-06 199273 129854 07-11-06 -1077937252 129854 08-11-06 -1077936760 129854 09-11-06 672037797 129854 10-11-06 -1077937324 129854 11-11-06 134555024 129854 - ferg -- Simon Leinen <simon@limmat.switch.ch> wrote: cidr-report writes:
Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 03-11-06 199409 129843 [...] 10-11-06 134555024 129854
Growth of the "global routing table" really picked up pace this week! (But maybe I'm just hallucinating for having heard the report from the IAB Routing Workshop report three times in a week :-) Or the CIDR Report software has an R200K problem? -- Simon. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
When my zebra BGP daemin looses its grip on life and dies a horrible death the rest to the scripts wander into a strange twilight zone and make up numbers sorry (I really need to code more defensively for this type of condition!) geoff At 04:56 AM 11/11/2006, Fergie wrote:
Indeed -- it apears to have flaked out a bit this (IETF) week. :-)
Date Prefixes CIDR Aggregated 04-11-06 199323 129829 05-11-06 199330 129854 06-11-06 199273 129854 07-11-06 -1077937252 129854 08-11-06 -1077936760 129854 09-11-06 672037797 129854 10-11-06 -1077937324 129854 11-11-06 134555024 129854
- ferg
-- Simon Leinen <simon@limmat.switch.ch> wrote:
cidr-report writes:
Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 03-11-06 199409 129843 [...] 10-11-06 134555024 129854
Growth of the "global routing table" really picked up pace this week! (But maybe I'm just hallucinating for having heard the report from the IAB Routing Workshop report three times in a week :-) Or the CIDR Report software has an R200K problem? -- Simon.
-- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
It sounds like government work! When something doesn't work, they just make numbers up! (Just be sure to create more plausible numbers next time! (smirk)) Scott -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Geoff Huston Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:15 PM To: Fergie; simon@limmat.switch.ch Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: The Cidr Report When my zebra BGP daemin looses its grip on life and dies a horrible death the rest to the scripts wander into a strange twilight zone and make up numbers sorry (I really need to code more defensively for this type of condition!) geoff At 04:56 AM 11/11/2006, Fergie wrote:
Indeed -- it apears to have flaked out a bit this (IETF) week. :-)
Date Prefixes CIDR Aggregated 04-11-06 199323 129829 05-11-06 199330 129854 06-11-06 199273 129854 07-11-06 -1077937252 129854 08-11-06 -1077936760 129854 09-11-06 672037797 129854 10-11-06 -1077937324 129854 11-11-06 134555024 129854
- ferg
-- Simon Leinen <simon@limmat.switch.ch> wrote:
cidr-report writes:
Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 03-11-06 199409 129843 [...] 10-11-06 134555024 129854
Growth of the "global routing table" really picked up pace this week! (But maybe I'm just hallucinating for having heard the report from the IAB Routing Workshop report three times in a week :-) Or the CIDR Report software has an R200K problem? -- Simon.
-- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
participants (3)
-
Fergie -
Geoff Huston -
Scott Morris