Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment
Hello, we have done a worldwide measurement to identify which ASes have propagated RPKI-invalid prefixes. We find an interesting phenomenon that some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial interfaces (e.g., provider interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer interfaces). Although there are other studies [1, 2] noting the same phenomenon, little is known about why some network operators perform different filtering policies at different interfaces. We are trying to figure out the reasons and summarize the optimal deployment policy for RPKI-invalid filtering. To this end, we create an anonymous questionnaire and hope you can help fill out it. Questionnaire link: https://qfreeaccountssjc1.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/preview/previewId/70bbaf01-b4a6-4f7d-aac4-33cff5b135a3/SV_dj62hVBXcEy5ryC?Q_CHL=preview&Q_SurveyVersionID=current Reference: [1] Help Validate ROV Adoption Measurements from RoVista. https://labs.ripe.net/author/tijay-chung/help-validate-rov-adoption-measurem... [2] 85% of MANRS Members Conformant to Actions 1 and 4. https://www.manrs.org/2023/01/85-of-manrs-members-conformant/ If you have any questions, concerns, issues, or comments, please send an email to qlc19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn Best, Lancheng
some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial interfaces (e.g., provider interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer interfaces).
i have heard it said that "my customer pays me to propagate their announcement, so i do not apply rov. let my peers filter it." randy
Thank you. I've heard similar feedback from several other network operators. It seems that this is one of the main reasons why some networks do not apply rov at customer interfaces. Best, Lancheng > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> > 发送时间: 2023-05-23 21:45:13 (星期二) > 收件人: "Lancheng Qin" <qlc19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> > 抄送: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > 主题: Re: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment > > > some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial > > interfaces (e.g., provider interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer > > interfaces). > > i have heard it said that "my customer pays me to propagate their > announcement, so i do not apply rov. let my peers filter it." > > randy </nanog@nanog.org></qlc19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn></randy@psg.com>
Hi, Although we strictly guarantee the anonymity of participants in this survey and do not disclose their specific information, we also allow participants to withdraw their answers. If you have filled out this questionnaire and do not want your answers to be disclosed, please send an email to qlc19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn. If not, please ignore this email. Best, Lancheng -----原始邮件----- 发件人:"Lancheng Qin" <qlc19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> 发送时间:2023-05-23 14:40:14 (星期二) 收件人: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> 抄送: 主题: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment Hello, we have done a worldwide measurement to identify which ASes have propagated RPKI-invalid prefixes. We find an interesting phenomenon that some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial interfaces (e.g., provider interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer interfaces). Although there are other studies [1, 2] noting the same phenomenon, little is known about why some network operators perform different filtering policies at different interfaces. We are trying to figure out the reasons and summarize the optimal deployment policy for RPKI-invalid filtering. To this end, we create an anonymous questionnaire and hope you can help fill out it. Questionnaire link: https://qfreeaccountssjc1.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/preview/previewId/70bbaf01-b4a6-4f7d-aac4-33cff5b135a3/SV_dj62hVBXcEy5ryC?Q_CHL=preview&Q_SurveyVersionID=current Reference: [1] Help Validate ROV Adoption Measurements from RoVista. https://labs.ripe.net/author/tijay-chung/help-validate-rov-adoption-measurem... [2] 85% of MANRS Members Conformant to Actions 1 and 4. https://www.manrs.org/2023/01/85-of-manrs-members-conformant/ If you have any questions, concerns, issues, or comments, please send an email to qlc19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn Best, Lancheng
participants (2)
-
Lancheng Qin -
Randy Bush