Does anybody know if part of this enforcement involves STIR/SHAKEN?
Basically the jist that it's fake auto warranty fraud calls. Or is this just requiring providers to do the forensics whichever way to enforce this? https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/21/tech/fcc-robocall-crackdown/index.html Mike
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
Basically the jist that it's fake auto warranty fraud calls. Or is this just requiring providers to do the forensics whichever way to enforce this?
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/21/tech/fcc-robocall-crackdown/index.html
As always speak with your corporate attorney or a licensed attorney familar with communications law. The FCC order is under the TRACED Act of 2019. The order doesn't depend on STIR/SHAKEN. The Traceback Consortium and providers use a variety of methods to identify the calls. "By this Order, the Bureau directs all U.S.-based voice service providers to investigate promptly the apparently illegal robocall traffic identified in section II.A. above. We further direct all voice service providers that locate any of the apparently illegal robocall traffic described in this Order to take immediate steps to effectively mitigate and prevent further transmission of the apparently unlawful calls." [...] "If the voice service provider concludes that the identified traffic was not illegal, the report must include an explanation as to why the provider has reasonably concluded that the identified calls were not illegal and what steps the voice service provider took to reach that conclusion." [...] The order is available https://www.fcc.gov/document/robocall-enforcement-order-all-us-based-voice-s...
On 7/22/22 4:00 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
Basically the jist that it's fake auto warranty fraud calls. Or is this just requiring providers to do the forensics whichever way to enforce this?
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/21/tech/fcc-robocall-crackdown/index.html
As always speak with your corporate attorney or a licensed attorney familar with communications law.
The FCC order is under the TRACED Act of 2019. The order doesn't depend on STIR/SHAKEN. The Traceback Consortium and providers use a variety of methods to identify the calls.
"By this Order, the Bureau directs all U.S.-based voice service providers to investigate promptly the apparently illegal robocall traffic identified in section II.A. above. We further direct all voice service providers that locate any of the apparently illegal robocall traffic described in this Order to take immediate steps to effectively mitigate and prevent further transmission of the apparently unlawful calls." [...] "If the voice service provider concludes that the identified traffic was not illegal, the report must include an explanation as to why the provider has reasonably concluded that the identified calls were not illegal and what steps the voice service provider took to reach that conclusion." [...]
The order is available https://www.fcc.gov/document/robocall-enforcement-order-all-us-based-voice-s...
So the FCC could have done this well before with routes that don't involve crypto authentication? That's what I've always assumed. Mike
participants (2)
-
Michael Thomas -
Sean Donelan