Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
I've been using it from Oregon, USA all morning without problems. On 9/21/2015 11:51 AM, Murat Kaipov wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
I get there with no problem. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 -------------------------------- http://twitter.com/kscotthelms -------------------------------- On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Murat Kaipov <mkaipov@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
No problems here from either v4 or v6. -- Hugo
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ Justin Wilson j2sw@mtin.net --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
On Sep 21, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com> wrote:
Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
No problems here from either v4 or v6.
-- Hugo
Now all works fine. mkaipov$ traceroute www.cisco.com traceroute to e144.dscb.akamaiedge.net (23.78.32.170), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 router.asus.com (10.10.0.1) 1.598 ms 1.287 ms 1.126 ms 2 62.182.11.92 (62.182.11.92) 1.878 ms 1.789 ms 1.863 ms 3 91.221.157.1 (91.221.157.1) 3.145 ms 3.361 ms 3.081 ms 4 rdn06.transtelecom.net (217.150.56.234) 10.898 ms 10.362 ms 10.067 ms 5 10.78.146.2 (10.78.146.2) 47.051 ms 47.222 ms 46.991 ms 6 * * * 7 eth2-4.r1.sto2.se.as5580.net (78.152.34.215) 76.838 ms 73.685 ms 73.822 ms 8 eth3-1.r1.cph1.dk.as5580.net (78.152.34.158) 82.728 ms 93.950 ms 82.614 ms 9 akamai-20940-gw.cph01-1.dk.as5580.net (78.152.57.10) 86.037 ms 85.568 ms 85.522 ms 10 a23-78-32-170.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (23.78.32.170) 81.347 ms 86.100 ms 81.352 ms MBP-Murat:~ mkaipov$
21 сент. 2015 г., в 22:33, Justin Wilson - MTIN <lists@mtin.net> написал(а):
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
Justin Wilson j2sw@mtin.net
--- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
On Sep 21, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com> wrote:
Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
No problems here from either v4 or v6.
-- Hugo
Available in Hungary. Roderick Beck Sales - Europe and the Americas This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia Networks has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
It works fine for me from Cox. --- Keith Stokes ________________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of Murat Kaipov <mkaipov@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:51 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: cisco.com unavailable Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
Thanks to all of you. I think there issue with ISP’s connectivity in Russia.
21 сент. 2015 г., в 21:55, Keith Stokes <keiths@neilltech.com> написал(а):
It works fine for me from Cox.
---
Keith Stokes
________________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of Murat Kaipov <mkaipov@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:51 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: cisco.com unavailable
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
Works from the UK from a few ISP's -- -- Regards, Hal Ponton Senior Network Engineer Buzcom / FibreWiFi
Keith Stokes <mailto:keiths@neilltech.com> 21 September 2015 19:55 It works fine for me from Cox.
---
Keith Stokes
________________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of Murat Kaipov <mkaipov@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:51 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: cisco.com unavailable
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom? Murat Kaipov <mailto:mkaipov@outlook.com> 21 September 2015 19:51 Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
Works for me via Frontier, south west Ohio. 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.10.10.1 2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.149.254.1 3 7 ms 5 ms 6 ms 45.52.8.205 4 21 ms 20 ms 21 ms 74.40.5.58 5 19 ms 20 ms 20 ms 74.42.149.189 6 22 ms 20 ms 21 ms 74.40.4.138 7 20 ms 20 ms 21 ms 4.53.98.17 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 49 ms 49 ms 49 ms 4.30.74.46 11 145 ms 48 ms 50 ms 72.163.0.5 12 48 ms 47 ms 47 ms 72.163.0.178 13 48 ms 47 ms 48 ms 72.163.2.98 14 48 ms 48 ms 48 ms 72.163.4.161 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Murat Kaipov <mkaipov@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
Working from Verizon FiOS [root@yosefh-OptiPlex-3020 ~]# wget cisco.com --2015-09-21 14:57:58-- http://cisco.com/ Resolving cisco.com (cisco.com)... 72.163.4.161, 2001:420:1101:1::a Connecting to cisco.com (cisco.com)|72.163.4.161|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://www.cisco.com/ [following] --2015-09-21 14:57:58-- http://www.cisco.com/ Resolving www.cisco.com (www.cisco.com)... 23.76.208.170, 2600:141b:4:288::90, 2600:141b:4:29b::90 Connecting to www.cisco.com (www.cisco.com)|23.76.208.170|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: unspecified [text/html] Saving to: ‘index.html’ [ <=> ] 52,865 --.-K/s in 0.01s 2015-09-21 14:57:58 (5.09 MB/s) - ‘index.html’ saved [52865] [root@yosefh-OptiPlex-3020 ~]# On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Murat Kaipov <mkaipov@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
I had no difficulty getting to it, but it appears that I probably got to an Akamai box: Non-authoritative answer: Name: e144.dscb.akamaiedge.net Addresses: 2600:1409:a:185::90 2600:1409:a:18b::90 23.200.208.170 Aliases: www.cisco.com www.cisco.com.akadns.net wwwds.cisco.com.edgekey.net wwwds.cisco.com.edgekey.net.globalredir.akadns.net Non-authoritative answer: Name: cisco.com Addresses: 2001:420:1101:1::a 72.163.4.161 On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Murat Kaipov <mkaipov@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Murat Kaipov wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/cisco.com
It's just you. http://cisco.com is up.
~Marcin
On 9/21/2015 11:51 AM, Murat Kaipov wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
All is well from Cogent, Charter, and Verizon Wireless
All set for me; East Africa, Kenya, Nairobi .. I can also see some serious dude fixing a bike on the site. Tracing route to cisco.com [72.163.4.161] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 11 ms 224 ms 13 ms 10.34.0.1 3 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms 196.207.31.181.accesskenya.com [196.207.31.181] 4 10 ms 10 ms 17 ms te2-1.er1.bp.nbo.accesskenya.net [196.207.31.145 ] 5 652 ms 161 ms 515 ms if-6-0-2.core4.LDN-London.as6453.net [80.231.76. 101] 6 395 ms 1139 ms 148 ms if-1-3-1-0.tcore1.LDN-London.as6453.net [80.231. 76.86] 7 197 ms 147 ms 188 ms 195.219.83.102 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 313 ms * 283 ms CISCO-SYSTE.ear1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.30.74.46] 11 270 ms 264 ms 329 ms rcdn9-cd2-dmzbb-gw2-ten1-1.cisco.com [72.163.0.2 1] 12 299 ms 326 ms 323 ms rcdn9-cd2-dmzdcc-gw2-por2.cisco.com [72.163.0.19 0] 13 291 ms 534 ms 256 ms rcdn9-16b-dcz05n-gw2-por2.cisco.com [72.163.2.11 0] 14 275 ms 598 ms 270 ms www1.cisco.com [72.163.4.161] Trace complete. On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Robert Glover <robertg@garlic.com> wrote:
On 9/21/2015 11:51 AM, Murat Kaipov wrote:
Hi folks! Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
All is well from Cogent, Charter, and Verizon Wireless
-- Samson Oduor
Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
Works fine here in The Netherlands (ISP: Solcon). Cheers, Sander
2 minutes ago all had worked fine, now I have same trouble. mkaipov$ traceroute cisco.com traceroute to cisco.com (72.163.4.161), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 router.asus.com (10.10.0.1) 1.536 ms 1.232 ms 1.176 ms 2 62.182.11.92 (62.182.11.92) 1.934 ms 2.924 ms 3.251 ms 3 isp2.aquafon.com (62.182.11.26) 2.140 ms 2.421 ms 2.380 ms 4 u111asr1002tr2-isp2.aquafon.com (91.221.157.5) 4.767 ms 3.515 ms 3.243 ms 5 62.183.37.150 (62.183.37.150) 3.585 ms 3.573 ms 3.465 ms 6 230.100.sochicom.biz (85.174.230.100) 3.898 ms 5.611 ms 3.671 ms 7 85.174.230.225 (85.174.230.225) 16.177 ms 17.043 ms 15.573 ms 8 85.175.2.69 (85.175.2.69) 13.401 ms 20.689 ms 13.170 ms 9 188.254.36.249 (188.254.36.249) 28.386 ms 188.254.36.253 (188.254.36.253) 14.295 ms 27.329 ms 10 87.226.133.103 (87.226.133.103) 72.963 ms * 69.451 ms 11 s-b3-link.telia.net (213.248.95.105) 49.969 ms 50.155 ms s-b3-link.telia.net (62.115.11.57) 66.943 ms 12 s-bb3-link.telia.net (213.155.133.16) 75.242 ms s-bb3-link.telia.net (62.115.137.158) 71.001 ms 70.112 ms 13 s-b6-link.telia.net (62.115.141.201) 71.606 ms s-b6-link.telia.net (62.115.136.23) 47.700 ms s-b6-link.telia.net (62.115.136.21) 48.270 ms 14 level3-ic-155475-s-b2.c.telia.net (213.248.99.134) 48.129 ms 49.995 ms 66.182 ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 cisco-syste.ear1.dallas1.level3.net (4.30.74.46) 195.112 ms 308.241 ms 193.757 ms 18 rcdn9-cd1-dmzbb-gw1-ten1-1.cisco.com (72.163.0.5) 197.443 ms 193.921 ms 420.050 ms 19 rcdn9-cd1-dmzdcc-gw1-por1.cisco.com (72.163.0.178) 307.371 ms 307.396 ms 306.593 ms 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * *
21 сент. 2015 г., в 22:05, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> написал(а):
Is cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom?
Works fine here in The Netherlands (ISP: Solcon).
Cheers, Sander
participants (16)
-
Bob Clabaugh -
Dovid Bender -
Hal Ponton -
Hugo Slabbert -
Jeff Shultz -
Josh Luthman -
Justin Wilson - MTIN -
Keith Stokes -
Marcin Cieslak -
Murat Kaipov -
Robert Glover -
Rod Beck -
Sam Oduor -
Sander Steffann -
Scott Helms -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu