Re: Zimbabwe satellite Internet link restored
Any chance of a moderator de-subscribing "behowell@tcc-ad.local" from nanog? Every time anyone posts it kicks back a DSN, either failed or mail-loop On 9/28/06, Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:24:30AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: [snip]
Or it could be a sign that the internet is sufficently valuable to the government that they must restore the link. Some may be a bit suspicious of the internet being that critical, but it just may be the case.
[snip]
Pr0n knows no politics.
-- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:15:44PM +0100, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Any chance of a moderator de-subscribing "behowell@tcc-ad.local" from nanog? Every time anyone posts it kicks back a DSN, either failed or mail-loop
More importantly: how did this address get subscribed to NANOG when manual verification is required to subscribe? -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:15:44PM +0100, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Any chance of a moderator de-subscribing "behowell@tcc-ad.local" from nanog? Every time anyone posts it kicks back a DSN, either failed or mail-loop
More importantly: how did this address get subscribed to NANOG when manual verification is required to subscribe?
behowell@real-domain.com is possibly subscribed, his email goes to mx.real-domain.com, which aliases to: behowell@tcc-ad.local which then bounces at the internal mailserver for tcc-ad.local. I'm just guessing, but that seems logical. It might even be: Brent.Edward.Howell@real-domain.com ... just to make it 'confusing' :) Either way I'm sure the crack MLC can whack the list properly and 'fix' it.
participants (3)
-
Alexander Harrowell -
Chris L. Morrow -
Jeremy Chadwick