Re: What is NANOG used for? (Was Re: Exodus?)
At 04:11 PM 1/3/99 -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
For all the topics that are regarded as being on-topic, there's a common aspect: they affect multiple providers. Telco issues. Tool issues. Vendor ... another way to look at it:
perhaps a web page which 'charters' the nanog list and defines the scope/nature of its intended discussions will help to avoid future misunderstandings? perhaps a version of the text of your note would be an excellent draft for that charter? d/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dave Crocker Tel: +60 (19) 3299 445 <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Post Office Box 296, U.P.M. Serdang, Selangor 43400 MALAYSIA Brandenburg Consulting <http://www.brandenburg.com> Tel: +1 (408) 246 8253 Fax: +1(408)273 6464 675 Spruce Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
At 11:37 AM 01/04/1999 +0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
... perhaps a web page which 'charters' the nanog list and defines the scope/nature of its intended discussions will help to avoid future misunderstandings?
Already in place (<http://www.nanog.org/aup.html>); note also the pre-posting guide referenced on that page. Just in case there's some confusion (and until it can be made perfectly obviously in the charter): Please do not use the Nanog mailing list as a NOC of first resort. This absolutely does not scale. /John
participants (2)
-
Dave Crocker -
John Curran