Re: FW: public key service

A slight correction.... On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Tsolis, Kristen wrote:
Hm? These words have been misattributed to me. I don't see any reason why the PGP trust model would be compromised by a keyserver network since the individual PGP user is checking keys and deciding which keys to trust. I welcome further conversation re:ISP-run keyservers on the keyserver-folks list, but I hope to see further coordination re: a NANOG keysigning party on this list. cheers, Kristen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 ktsolis@mindspring.com wrote:
Oops, was that my fault? Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com> is the person quoted there.
You are absolutely correct.
Again, I would be willing to organize this. I have done keysignings of various sizes before, and each time it gets a little smoother. Phil Z. and I have been talking about methods of making large-scale keysignings happen more efficiently, and I would love the chance to see if our ideas will improve things. - --Len. __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | "Everything looks bad Technology Consultant | if you remember it." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Homer Simpson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE5WQBdPYrxsgmsCmoRAn2rAJ0SgmPfsO89TnhOEN/duxl1wAlT/ACeOuHt 0hPmYLXFE/K2Mgn/TgrOKNg= =7ZI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
ktsolis@mindspring.com
-
L. Sassaman