On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:32:53AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:

...

...

(It would be cool if Cisco would understand that hardware forwarding platforms need useful netflow with MAC-addresses in there... ASR9k at [..] At the risk of introducing religion, I will mention sFlow...

Yes... and this is helping exactly why...? Given the overwhelming support for sFlow in (Cisco-) hardware routers used as peering edge? :-)

I ask Cisco for sFlow support on a regular basis. Cisco typically respond with some variation of NIH syndrome. Anyway, back to my question :-) -- Tim:>