At 11:31 6/12/98 +0900, you wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Dean Robb wrote:
Let's remember for a moment that not all net.users are net.savvy. I think the TLDs SHOULD have a logical category structure. If I'm trying to find an educational institution, I'd expect to find it in the .edu TLD, a commercial organization in .com, etc. As I recall, that's the entire purpose in naming the TLDs as they are.
Let's remember that not all net.users and net.resources are located in north.america. And that not all net.names are registered with the same.nic. I think its time you opened your eyes a.bit.
Eyes open just fine. Even here, there's no reason one cannot register as a .us domain. However, the question arises...what has your comment got to do with the correct use of TLDs? What do spammers and nails have in common? They're both intended for hammering. Dean Robb PC-Easy On-site computer services (757) 495-EASY [3279]
On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Dean Robb wrote:
At 11:31 6/12/98 +0900, you wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Dean Robb wrote:
Let's remember for a moment that not all net.users are net.savvy. I think the TLDs SHOULD have a logical category structure. If I'm trying to find an educational institution, I'd expect to find it in the .edu TLD, a commercial organization in .com, etc. As I recall, that's the entire purpose in naming the TLDs as they are.
Let's remember that not all net.users and net.resources are located in north.america. And that not all net.names are registered with the same.nic. I think its time you opened your eyes a.bit.
Eyes open just fine. Even here, there's no reason one cannot register as a .us domain. However, the question arises...what has your comment got to do with the correct use of TLDs?
You were prattling on (look up a few inches) about how everything can be perfectly pigeon-holed in five or six TLDs with a "logical category structure." That's pretty naive.
Dean Robb
matt --matt@bikkle.interq.or.jp------------------------------------------- Matt Ghali MG406/GM023JP - System Administrator, interQ, Inc AS7506 "Sub-optimal is a state of mind." -Dave Rand, <dlr@bungi.com>
At 12:59 AM 6/12/98 -0400, Dean Robb wrote:
At 11:31 6/12/98 +0900, you wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Dean Robb wrote:
Let's remember for a moment that not all net.users are net.savvy. I think the TLDs SHOULD have a logical category structure. If I'm trying to find an educational institution, I'd expect to find it in the .edu TLD, a commercial organization in .com, etc. As I recall, that's the entire purpose in naming the TLDs as they are.
Let's remember that not all net.users and net.resources are located in north.america. And that not all net.names are registered with the same.nic. I think its time you opened your eyes a.bit.
Eyes open just fine. Even here, there's no reason one cannot register as a .us domain. However, the question arises...what has your comment got to do with the correct use of TLDs?
Hey Dean, How're things on SPAM-L? WRT, DOMAINS, I suggest that you join DOMAIN-POLICY. We've been hashing this stuff out for months already. Already been to, and left, where you're just getting to, here. ___________________________________________________ Roeland M.J. Meyer, ISOC (InterNIC RM993) e-mail: <mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com>rmeyer@mhsc.com Internet phone: hawk.mhsc.com Personal web pages: <http://www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer>www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer Company web-site: <http://www.mhsc.com/>www.mhsc.com/ ___________________________________________ SecureMail from MHSC.NET is coming soon!
participants (3)
-
Dean Robb -
just me. -
Roeland M.J. Meyer