Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?
On 13 Oct 2023, at 08:31, scott <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
On 10/11/23 7:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Virtually no home network on the planet has fully functional IPv4 available to it.
Hawaiian Telcom customers have it. No blocks at all.
So they don’t use NAT? The internet is a peer-to-peer network. NAT breaks that. But I can’t reach IPv6 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device without a transition box is no different to I can’t reach IPv4 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device because PNAT *is* a transition device. It’s a bogus complaint and I’m calling it out.
scott
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
UGH, you called me out and I have no defense. I was thinking of our non-NAT customers. scott On 10/12/23 11:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
On 13 Oct 2023, at 08:31, scott <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
On 10/11/23 7:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Virtually no home network on the planet has fully functional IPv4 available to it.
Hawaiian Telcom customers have it. No blocks at all.
So they don’t use NAT? The internet is a peer-to-peer network. NAT breaks that.
But I can’t reach IPv6 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device without a transition box is no different to I can’t reach IPv4 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device because PNAT *is* a transition device. It’s a bogus complaint and I’m calling it out.
scott
Crap, that was supposed to be private. scott On 10/12/23 11:29 PM, scott via NANOG wrote:
UGH, you called me out and I have no defense. I was thinking of our non-NAT customers.
scott
On 10/12/23 11:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
On 13 Oct 2023, at 08:31, scott <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
On 10/11/23 7:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Virtually no home network on the planet has fully functional IPv4 available to it.
Hawaiian Telcom customers have it. No blocks at all.
So they don’t use NAT? The internet is a peer-to-peer network. NAT breaks that.
But I can’t reach IPv6 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device without a transition box is no different to I can’t reach IPv4 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device because PNAT *is* a transition device. It’s a bogus complaint and I’m calling it out.
scott
participants (2)
-
Mark Andrews -
scott