https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173 Quoting from the post: " Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9. Previous owner was GE. Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range. https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-128-0-0-1.html "
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 0:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com> wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
Seems ALTDB should delete the old AS 80 / GE IRR proxy route registration: http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/3.0.0.0 Kind regards, Job
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:58 PM Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote:
Seems ALTDB should delete the old AS 80 / GE IRR proxy route registration: http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/3.0.0.0
Done. For anyone else who is suffering from their prefixes malingering in ALTDB from previous users and has ultimately failed to resolve the issue with the maintainer of the object, you can escalate the matter to the db-admin@altdb.net alias. We have recently started a cleanup effort of the ALTDB database to improve the quality of the routing information present in it. -- Kenneth Finnegan ALTDB Admin
On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:56, Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 0:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com> wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9. Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html
https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-128-0-0-1.html
"
Seems ALTDB should delete the old AS 80 / GE IRR proxy route registration: http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/3.0.0.0
It’s been done. -jav
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming. -Matt On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123]. Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9. Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html
https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-128-0-0-1.html
"
3.4.5.6/24 could be an interesting block to put easily memorable IP services in... On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
On 09/11/2018 00:46, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
3.4.5.6/24 <http://3.4.5.6/24> could be an interesting block to put easily memorable IP services in...
My upbringing in the 90s makes '5.6.7.8' far more memorable. :) -- Tom
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24? -Steve On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC). t On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
4.0.0.0/8 has been GTE/Level3 forever. 4.2.2.1 - 6 have been L3 DNS as far back as I can remember. On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:32 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com> wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
John Orthoefer and I (and dozens of other BBN folks on this list) both worked for BBNPlanet at the time that 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 were assigned. John was one of the folks who built and ran that system. So when he said "I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4" and my comment of "I think the dial modem folks beat us to..." was referring to the fact that when 4/8 was first being deployed on AS1 we started assigning blocks to various groups and they realized that 4.4.4.0/XX had already been delegated to another internal group (I think it was the dial group). On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:45 PM Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
4.0.0.0/8 has been GTE/Level3 forever.
4.2.2.1 - 6 have been L3 DNS as far back as I can remember.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:32 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com> wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
Speaking of AS1 - I've been wondering, what's it being used for? It looks like Level3 owns it, and it's announcing a handful of prefixes and peering with a bunch of random ASes from many different countries. On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
John Orthoefer and I (and dozens of other BBN folks on this list) both worked for BBNPlanet at the time that 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 were assigned. John was one of the folks who built and ran that system.
So when he said "I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4" and my comment of "I think the dial modem folks beat us to..." was referring to the fact that when 4/8 was first being deployed on AS1 we started assigning blocks to various groups and they realized that 4.4.4.0/XX had already been delegated to another internal group (I think it was the dial group).
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:45 PM Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
4.0.0.0/8 has been GTE/Level3 forever.
4.2.2.1 - 6 have been L3 DNS as far back as I can remember.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:32 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com> wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
Remember when AS 1 was Genuity? First BGP session I ever set-up was with AS 1. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 6:44:45 PM To: Steve Meuse Cc: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: Amazon now controls 3.0.0.0/8 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Speaking of AS1 - I've been wondering, what's it being used for? It looks like Level3 owns it, and it's announcing a handful of prefixes and peering with a bunch of random ASes from many different countries. On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org<mailto:smeuse@mara.org>> wrote: John Orthoefer and I (and dozens of other BBN folks on this list) both worked for BBNPlanet at the time that 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 were assigned. John was one of the folks who built and ran that system. So when he said "I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4" and my comment of "I think the dial modem folks beat us to..." was referring to the fact that when 4/8 was first being deployed on AS1 we started assigning blocks to various groups and they realized that 4.4.4.0/XX<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.4.4.0%2FXX&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600111541&sdata=jfL%2FllncZlcRgdY1CdDjC5ueGio02dDgP4tlslqPzLU%3D&reserved=0> had already been delegated to another internal group (I think it was the dial group). On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:45 PM Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote: 4.0.0.0/8<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.0.0.0%2F8&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600111541&sdata=ggblju816KE%2F8TWMXEKUYmpACyy1vH54uRD0dBCCOtk%3D&reserved=0> has been GTE/Level3 forever. 4.2.2.1 - 6 have been L3 DNS as far back as I can remember. On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:32 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com<mailto:toddunder@gmail.com>> wrote: google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC). t On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org<mailto:smeuse@mara.org>> wrote: I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.4.4.0%2F24&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600111541&sdata=omZw5JrEbg7yJeNd%2BhwNMVDz6mMAX4C0%2FuzJ5M2VObk%3D&reserved=0>? -Steve On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com<mailto:jco@direwolf.com>> wrote: I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123]. Johno On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com<mailto:merculiani@gmail.com>> wrote: So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming. -Matt On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com<mailto:eric.kuhnke@gmail.com> wrote: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com%2Fitem%3Fid%3D18407173&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600111541&sdata=dMAKpJXW3ns4K5X6KZAROOhTlPTmHKYvweIsjs7Ot90%3D&reserved=0> Quoting from the post: " Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F3.0.0.0%2F9&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600111541&sdata=Ge2tXIZCF3fJB9fpwBjG58CUFf%2FPYtAKeosqIIF3JKQ%3D&reserved=0> and 3.128.0.0/9<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F3.128.0.0%2F9&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600111541&sdata=ncpEmnLx%2BWDOIkwMB%2FdR%2FsKmGUJYLLJTvVJL4uUbk%2BI%3D&reserved=0>. Previous owner was GE. Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range. https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwhois.arin.net%2Frest%2Fnet%2FNET-3-0-0-0-1.html&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600267787&sdata=PPPGSPw3awgQHufOUEZ837KloMCbBKHbm72WXTIwfuI%3D&reserved=0> https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-128-0-0-1.html<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwhois.arin.net%2Frest%2Fnet%2FNET-3-128-0-0-1.html&data=02%7C01%7Cpaul.dalton%40sprint.com%7Caf9b460440684d62ebfa08d645ed7a98%7C4f8bc0acbd784bf5b55f1b31301d9adf%7C0%7C0%7C636773283600267787&sdata=hadTxFotL%2BctXNNDmthB5EGlapJZHfv1m4js3uwYHN4%3D&reserved=0> "
It's still in use, I believe Level(3)/CenturyLink uses it for either their VPN or Voice network. -Steve On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:44 PM Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> wrote:
Speaking of AS1 - I've been wondering, what's it being used for? It looks like Level3 owns it, and it's announcing a handful of prefixes and peering with a bunch of random ASes from many different countries.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
John Orthoefer and I (and dozens of other BBN folks on this list) both worked for BBNPlanet at the time that 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 were assigned. John was one of the folks who built and ran that system.
So when he said "I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4" and my comment of "I think the dial modem folks beat us to..." was referring to the fact that when 4/8 was first being deployed on AS1 we started assigning blocks to various groups and they realized that 4.4.4.0/XX had already been delegated to another internal group (I think it was the dial group).
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:45 PM Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
4.0.0.0/8 has been GTE/Level3 forever.
4.2.2.1 - 6 have been L3 DNS as far back as I can remember.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:32 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com> wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173 > > Quoting from the post: > > " > > Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9. > > Previous owner was GE. > > Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being > assigned in that range. > > https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html > > https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-128-0-0-1.html > " > > > >
A large part of those peerings appears across various tools because people (mistakenly) just use "1" in prepends (and for that matter AS2 and AS3 as well). We looked at that data a while back and there was a very high amount of noise around that ASN. On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:16 AM Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io> wrote:
Speaking of AS1 - I've been wondering, what's it being used for? It looks like Level3 owns it, and it's announcing a handful of prefixes and peering with a bunch of random ASes from many different countries.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
John Orthoefer and I (and dozens of other BBN folks on this list) both worked for BBNPlanet at the time that 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 were assigned. John was one of the folks who built and ran that system.
So when he said "I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4" and my comment of "I think the dial modem folks beat us to..." was referring to the fact that when 4/8 was first being deployed on AS1 we started assigning blocks to various groups and they realized that 4.4.4.0/XX had already been delegated to another internal group (I think it was the dial group).
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:45 PM Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
4.0.0.0/8 has been GTE/Level3 forever.
4.2.2.1 - 6 have been L3 DNS as far back as I can remember.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:32 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com> wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173 > > Quoting from the post: > > " > > Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9. > > Previous owner was GE. > > Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being > assigned in that range. > > https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html > > https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-128-0-0-1.html > " > > > >
-- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com
Obligatory list of all known same-quad servers and their DNS status - corrections welcome: https://gist.github.com/roycewilliams/6cb91ed94b88730321ca3076006229f1 If there is info about previous/historical use of these IPs, I'd like to find a way to incorporate that as well. -- Royce On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:31 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com> wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
Maybe Amazon will do something cool with 3.1.33.7 ... dan On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, at 8:30 PM, Todd Underwood wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com> wrote:>>>
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].>>> Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com> wrote:>>>> So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and
3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.>>>> -Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com wrote:>>>>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 and 3.128.0.0/9. Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.>>>>> https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html
"
3.141.59.27 might be handy. Matt On 9/11/18 1:22 pm, Dan Lowe wrote:
Maybe Amazon will do something cool with 3.1.33.7 ...
dan
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, at 8:30 PM, Todd Underwood wrote:
google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC).
t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org <mailto:smeuse@mara.org>> wrote:
I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24 <http://4.4.4.0/24>?
-Steve
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer <jco@direwolf.com <mailto:jco@direwolf.com>> wrote:
I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at the time I suspect we would have used 4.4.4.[123].
Johno
On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:58, Matt Erculiani <merculiani@gmail.com <mailto:merculiani@gmail.com>> wrote:
So it looks like GE will be solvent for a few more years and 3.3.3.3 DNS is incoming.
-Matt
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 17:54 Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com <mailto:eric.kuhnke@gmail.com> wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18407173
Quoting from the post:
"
Apparently bought in two chunks: 3.0.0.0/9 <http://3.0.0.0/9> and 3.128.0.0/9 <http://3.128.0.0/9>.
Previous owner was GE.
Anecdotal reports across the Internet that AWS EIPs are now being assigned in that range.
https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-0-0-0-1.html
https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-3-128-0-0-1.html
"
-- /* Matt Perkins Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd. Office 1300 133 299 matt@spectrum.com.au Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000 Spectrum Networks is a member of the Communications Alliance & TIO */
participants (16)
-
Anurag Bhatia -
Dalton, Paul P [CTO] -
Dan Lowe -
Eric Kuhnke -
Javier Henderson -
Job Snijders -
John Orthoefer -
Kenneth Finnegan -
Matt Erculiani -
Matt Perkins -
Ross Tajvar -
Royce Williams -
Steve Meuse -
Todd Underwood -
Tom Beecher -
Tom Hill