On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:58:27 EST, "Justin M. Streiner" said:

...

Has anyone seen any indication that, given the US government's push to deploy IPv6, they will start (or perhaps they've started already?) writing mandates for applicant networks to have IPv6 connectivity into the requirements for federally funded grants?

I haven't seen any. But we've been doing IPv6 for so long that it wouldn't make a notice in our network group - people would just check it off as "BTDT",

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: perhaps after calling our helpdesk and asking "Do we have it" and being told "Yes".

As with most Internet-related issues, the "market" will indeed decide. It amazes me how many times we revisit this issue. :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHhGh+q1pz9mNUZTMRAnM9AKDjm8KzlJSEA7C7mOOcSSY0AEIg1QCfbax7 modWuSZPtckh6auU5jztER4= =iLJ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ Please note: message attached