not that it seems to matter to anyone that much, but the reason that the "cisco-nsp@cic.net" list (now "cisco-nsp@iag.net" I believe) was created was so cisco specific service provider questions/discussions like this wouldn't clutter the nanog list. not that it seems to matter that much, thanks, yfrv, dave
not that it seems to matter to anyone that much, but the reason that the "cisco-nsp@cic.net" list (now "cisco-nsp@iag.net" I believe) was created was so cisco specific service provider questions/discussions like this wouldn't clutter the nanog list.
not that it seems to matter that much,
thanks,
yfrv,
dave
cisco-nsp@iagnet.net is the list. brad reynolds ber@cwru.edu
cisco-nsp@iagnet.net. -- james g.k. rishaw dal/efnet:gavroche __ IAGnet/CIC/netILLINOIS Backoffice DID:216.902.5455 FAX:216.623.3566 \/ 800.637.4IAGx5455 "The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them." - Mark Twain
On Wed, Dec 10, 1997 at 08:02:40PM -0800, Dave O'Leary wrote:
not that it seems to matter to anyone that much, but the reason that the "cisco-nsp@cic.net" list (now "cisco-nsp@iag.net" I believe) was created
actually, cisco-nsp@iagnet.net. Send messages to majordomo@iagnet.net to subscribe. -dorian
participants (4)
-
Bradley Reynolds -
Dave O'Leary -
Dorian R. Kim -
jamieļ¼ intuition.iagnet.net