I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays. What do you use? /Tias
Colin Alston <karnaugh@karnaugh.za.net> writes:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
Omnigrafle and Dia are all I can add to your list
I didn't see it mentioned in the thread, but I've ditched Dia for Inkscape. I find it a bit prettier. Of course, I mostly also just use omnigraffle. seph
On 11.02.2009, at 14:12, Malte von dem Hagen wrote:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays. What do you use?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
Agree fully, I use OmniGraffle extensively and have for a long time. It's worth mentioning that OG can export to Visio-XML format, so you don't lock yourself into the .graffle format forever. Chris
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays. What do you use?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
OmniGraffle appears to be Mac only. Anything for us Mac deficient people? -- Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean.
Concept Draw is compatible with Windows and Mac. UI is similar to Visio. http://www.conceptdraw.com/en/ On Feb 11, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Ray Burkholder wrote:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays. What do you use?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
OmniGraffle appears to be Mac only. Anything for us Mac deficient people?
-- Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean.
I use the free basic version of http://www.gliffy.com for mock-ups. It doesn't go as deep as OmniGraffle or Visio, but it's enough to illustrate concepts to NOC guys or executives.
Ray Burkholder wrote:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays. What do you use? OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
OmniGraffle appears to be Mac only. Anything for us Mac deficient people?
Dia is simple, easy to use, general purpose http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
...except I've not found any good networking/systems stencils for omnigraffle (even on graffletopia). I tried to import the visio ones in 5.0 but that didn't work too well. Someone out there have something for omnigraffle that rivals the visio network stencils? Thanks, craig
Am 11.02.2009 21:50 Uhr, Craig Holland schrieb:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Did he?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
...except I've not found any good networking/systems stencils for omnigraffle (even on graffletopia). I tried to import the visio ones in 5.0 but that didn't work too well. Someone out there have something for omnigraffle that rivals the visio network stencils?
Depends on the target audience, but for documentation purposes, there is obviously no need for shiny, eyecandy stencils but only for distinguishable figures. Use circles for routers, rectangles for switches and so on. There are enough geometric stencils available. Regards, .m
Le mercredi 11 février 2009 à 23:34 +0100, Malte von dem Hagen a écrit :
Am 11.02.2009 21:50 Uhr, Craig Holland schrieb:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Did he?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
...except I've not found any good networking/systems stencils for omnigraffle (even on graffletopia). I tried to import the visio ones in 5.0 but that didn't work too well. Someone out there have something for omnigraffle that rivals the visio network stencils?
Depends on the target audience, but for documentation purposes, there is obviously no need for shiny, eyecandy stencils but only for distinguishable figures. Use circles for routers, rectangles for switches and so on. There are enough geometric stencils available.
Or ;)... Unless that you need runtime input, parse your configuration file repository, and build quite nice looking documents using TeX (plus, if you fancy nice graphics, pstricks, metapost, or pgf/TiKz). That's easy with a small few lines of perl (or your parsing language of choice). If you need run-time data, simply script it into the above mentioned "engine." The engineering way of lazily producing "marketing visual quality" documents... IMHO :) Cheers, mh
Regards,
.m
-- michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
Le mercredi 11 février 2009 à 23:51 +0100, Michael Hallgren a écrit :
Le mercredi 11 février 2009 à 23:34 +0100, Malte von dem Hagen a écrit :
Am 11.02.2009 21:50 Uhr, Craig Holland schrieb:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Did he?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
...except I've not found any good networking/systems stencils for omnigraffle (even on graffletopia). I tried to import the visio ones in 5.0 but that didn't work too well. Someone out there have something for omnigraffle that rivals the visio network stencils?
Depends on the target audience, but for documentation purposes, there is obviously no need for shiny, eyecandy stencils but only for distinguishable figures. Use circles for routers, rectangles for switches and so on. There are enough geometric stencils available.
Or ;)... Unless that you need runtime input, parse your configuration file repository, and build quite nice looking documents using TeX (plus, if you fancy nice graphics, pstricks, metapost, or pgf/TiKz). That's easy with a small few lines of perl (or your parsing language of choice). If you need run-time data, simply script it into the above mentioned "engine." The engineering way of lazily producing "marketing visual quality" documents... IMHO :)
If you're not used to this kind of document authoring, I believe TiKz is your best/first friend. mh
Cheers,
mh
Regards,
.m
-- michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
> OmniGraffle is the better Visio. Me three. We all use OmniGraffle. And Adobe Illustrator to create new objects. -Bill
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:27:35 -0800 (PST), Bill Woodcock wrote:
> OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
Me three. We all use OmniGraffle. And Adobe Illustrator to create new objects.
Me four, except I'm too lazy to create new objects and just slurp them from Graffletopia: <http://graffletopia.com/categories/networks> --chuck
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:27:35AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
Me three. We all use OmniGraffle. And Adobe Illustrator to create new objects.
I use Omnigraffle all the time. Check out graffletopia for new stencils: http://www.graffletopia.com/ (It's also available in the integrated search box in Omnigraffle.) Also of note - OmniGraffle can import OmniOutliner files (among some other things) and make a diagram out of the tree. -- - Adam ** Expert Technical Project and Business Management **** System Performance Analysis and Architecture ****** [ http://www.adamfields.com ] [ http://workstuff.tumblr.com ] ........... Technology Blog [ http://www.aquick.org/blog ] ............ Personal Blog [ http://www.adamfields.com/resume.html ].. Experience [ http://www.flickr.com/photos/fields ] ... Photos [ http://www.twitter.com/fields ].......... Twitter [ http://www.morningside-analytics.com ] .. Latest Venture [ http://www.confabb.com ] ................ Founder
OmniGraffle all the way On Feb 11, 2009, at 8:12 AM, Malte von dem Hagen wrote:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays. What do you use?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
rgds,
.m
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:06:09PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
To what end? The visio or 'presentation software' straightjackets are common for customer-facing presentations. I strongly advise automated solutions for real, day to day use. - dot -> graphviz (http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0210/ppt/stephen.pdf) _ tkined - network-weathermap.com - ...plenty more I don't have at my fingertips on evdo. And just use xpaint/gimp for cleaning up images from those for any internal documentation :-) Cheers! Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:06:09PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
I'd like to put a second request. I often want to very quickly mock-up a diagram that I'm going to use for myself or for internal purposes. Is there any application that takes some kind of *simple* description and produces a (possibly not so beautiful) picture? For example, I might say something like: Router(rtr1) connects to vlan 100 Router(rtr2) connects to Router(rtr1) via T1 switch(sw1) connects to vlan100 switch(sw2) connects to Router(rtr2) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw1) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw2) -- Ross Vandegrift ross@kallisti.us "If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough, the songs get tougher." --Woody Guthrie
On Feb 11, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
I'd like to put a second request. I often want to very quickly mock-up a diagram that I'm going to use for myself or for internal purposes.
Is there any application that takes some kind of *simple* description and produces a (possibly not so beautiful) picture? For example, I might say something like:
Router(rtr1) connects to vlan 100 Router(rtr2) connects to Router(rtr1) via T1 switch(sw1) connects to vlan100 switch(sw2) connects to Router(rtr2) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw1) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw2)
The aforementioned graphviz program "dot" (and friends) will do exactly this. http://www.graphviz.org/ There's a command-line version and a spiffy GUI version for the mac. It's a great way to go. It may be unsurprising that it was an at&t project. -Dave
Thanks all for your input. One thing that hits me is how different networks are documented. Are there any best practice communicated (RFC/IETF)? I like the idea of having one physical version showing cables and devices (CDP/EDP/LLDP view pretty much) and one logical view showing IP subnets. Many times I found *documented* networks where this is all combined making it very unclear. The hard part is to visually show what VLANs are active in each switch. Thoughts? /Tias
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:11:38PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote: [...]
I like the idea of having one physical version showing cables and devices (CDP/EDP/LLDP view pretty much) and one logical view showing IP subnets. Many times I found *documented* networks where this is all combined making it very unclear. The hard part is to visually show what VLANs are active in each switch.
Thoughts?
You're hitting the nail on the head. Most people worry about the *tool* being used, and neglect the information. Most networks need at least two diagrams: - a logical map showing network boundaries/collision domains/etc. (This is where VLANs get documented) - a physical map showing *how* things are connected. (This is where equipment and their interconnects are documented) Once you get that into your head, the best tool is the one that most people can use. I've been using PowerPoint for a couple of years and haven't run into anyone that says, "I can't read that."
Hej, Am 11.02.2009 19:13 Uhr, John Osmon schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:11:38PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I like the idea of having one physical version showing cables and devices (CDP/EDP/LLDP view pretty much) and one logical view showing IP subnets. Many times I found *documented* networks where this is all combined making it very unclear. The hard part is to visually show what VLANs are active in each switch.
Most networks need at least two diagrams: - a logical map showing network boundaries/collision domains/etc. (This is where VLANs get documented) - a physical map showing *how* things are connected. (This is where equipment and their interconnects are documented)
the actual needs strongly depend on the design of the network. If your network is segemented by many routers, it may even be sufficient to do a dozen or so traceroutes and parse the results ;-) If you run flat, switched networks with hundreds of switches but only few routers and possibly extreme heterogeneous subnetting in a multi-vendor environment, you do not get very far by parsing configs or "autodiscovering" the net. It becomes even more interesting if you run active layer 1 equipment like DWDM boxes or radio connections :-) Personally, I think most important is a clean documentation of Layers 1 and 2 AND the corresponding contact data for 3rd party sites/lines/equipment. These are the things you cannot get easily out of your network, and when experiencing failure on that level, you'll be happy to have this information on one single map. Always remember: Layer 3 is easy. Routing is easy. You have a lot of tools and deterministic protocols. Layers 1/2 are the wild jungle where you may see strange things happen and are partly blind and constrained. Combining the maps for Layers 1 and 2, by the way, is possible. Use colours, line types, and again geometric figures. Regards, .m
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:11:38PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Thanks all for your input. One thing that hits me is how different networks are documented. Are there any best practice communicated (RFC/IETF)?
As an aside, for ASCII network diagrams a la Internet Draft, I found that Email Effects (http://www.sigsoftware.com/emaileffects/) was rather useful. Obviously there's only so much you can do in 80 columns of ASCII :) -- Tim
On Feb 11, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Malte von dem Hagen wrote:
Hi,
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
Is there any application that takes some kind of *simple* description and produces a (possibly not so beautiful) picture?
yes, Omnigraffle here as well. Can be simple AND beautiful.
rgds,
.m
Agreed. We use it for all our network and service diagrams.. probably because we're all Mac users! :D -- Brad Fleming Kansas Research and Education Network
You can also use Lan Surveyor from us here @SolarWinds. There's a light version called "Lan Surveyor Express" that discovers the network (layer 2 and 3) and then draws the topology for you in Visio. You can of course buy it from SolarWinds.Com but there's also a special link that we use to give it away to partners. Feel free to download to download and use that one (free): http://www.solarwinds.com/register/registrationform.aspx?Program=583&c=7 0150000000E50d Josh -----Original Message----- From: Brad Fleming [mailto:bdfleming@kanren.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:06 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Network diagram software On Feb 11, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Malte von dem Hagen wrote:
Hi,
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
Is there any application that takes some kind of *simple* description and produces a (possibly not so beautiful) picture?
yes, Omnigraffle here as well. Can be simple AND beautiful.
rgds,
.m
Agreed. We use it for all our network and service diagrams.. probably because we're all Mac users! :D -- Brad Fleming Kansas Research and Education Network
yWorks http://www.yworks.com/en/index.html worth a try, its yEd is free. m On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Malte von dem Hagen <mvh@hosteurope.de> wrote:
Hi,
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
Is there any application that takes some kind of *simple* description and produces a (possibly not so beautiful) picture?
yes, Omnigraffle here as well. Can be simple AND beautiful.
rgds,
.m
-----Original Message----- From: Ross Vandegrift [mailto:ross@kallisti.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:42 AM To: Mathias Wolkert Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Network diagram software
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:06:09PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
I'd like to put a second request. I often want to very quickly mock-up a diagram that I'm going to use for myself or for internal purposes.
Is there any application that takes some kind of *simple* description and produces a (possibly not so beautiful) picture? For example, I might say something like:
Router(rtr1) connects to vlan 100 Router(rtr2) connects to Router(rtr1) via T1 switch(sw1) connects to vlan100 switch(sw2) connects to Router(rtr2) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw1) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw2)
Isn't there something comparable, at the virtual level, that draws pictures from RPSL descriptions?
Graphviz will do this. (www.graphviz.org) The basic (dot) syntax for what you describe below is: digraph G { R1 -> VLAN100; R2 -> R1; SW1 -> VLAN100; SW2 -> R2; H1 -> SW1; H2 -> SW1; H3 -> SW2; H4 -> SW2; } It'll output a GIF flowchart-style diagram with the nodes connected as described above. It's also good for visualizing BGP AS paths . -----Original Message----- From: Ross Vandegrift [mailto:ross@kallisti.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:42 AM To: Mathias Wolkert Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Network diagram software On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:06:09PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
I'd like to put a second request. I often want to very quickly mock-up a diagram that I'm going to use for myself or for internal purposes. Is there any application that takes some kind of *simple* description and produces a (possibly not so beautiful) picture? For example, I might say something like: Router(rtr1) connects to vlan 100 Router(rtr2) connects to Router(rtr1) via T1 switch(sw1) connects to vlan100 switch(sw2) connects to Router(rtr2) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw1) A few hosts connect to Switch(sw2) -- Ross Vandegrift ross@kallisti.us "If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough, the songs get tougher." --Woody Guthrie
On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:06 AM, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
/Tias
Two packages that I'm looking at right now for a project. RackMonkey http://flux.org.uk/projects/rackmonkey/ Simple, AJAX-ified, looks very easy to use for non-nerds. Keeps track of rack space allocations, devices, even does some neat tricks using Dell service tags to let you see warranty/config info. RackTables http://racktables.org/ More advanced, but quite a bit more complex. Keeps track of devices, how they're connected, IP allocations, vlans, "virtual servers", etc. Some tools to let you automatically populate the database. Neither appear to do power management, or much in the way of physical cable routing. Power is becoming a big thing for everyone - a tool that let us track idle/average/max power loads per device, and play 'what-if' with circuit/rack placement would make my life a lot easier. Like others posted, one of the big problems is that you can't put everything into one visualization. For us, we need physical/L1 (rack space planning, power planning, cable routing, asset tracking, etc), network/L2 (switches, vlans, mac addresses), IP/L3 (IP management, subnets, virtual servers, etc), Application/L4+ (what apps/services run on which servers, domain names, etc) I'm not aware of any one tool that does all of that, but there seems to be a lot of appeal in tying all those things together. -- Kevin
-----Original Message----- From: Kevin Day [mailto:toasty@dragondata.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:16 PM To: Mathias Wolkert Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Network diagram software
On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:06 AM, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
/Tias
Two packages that I'm looking at right now for a project.
RackMonkey http://flux.org.uk/projects/rackmonkey/
Simple, AJAX-ified, looks very easy to use for non-nerds. Keeps track of rack space allocations, devices, even does some neat tricks using Dell service tags to let you see warranty/config info.
You remind me of a design discussion, well-lubricated with beer, in which my team was trying, in spite of top management, to design great carrier routers. At one point, partially for RFC4098 benchmarking, we wanted to put a GPS card into some prototypes, originally as a time reference. We started thinking what else we could do with it, assuming we could get an enhanced-accuracy GPS (DGPS/WAAS) signal into the machine room. Physical inventory became a possibility. Somewhere, however, it started moving into the silly, including oscillation indicating earthquakes, and then graceful arcs as the rack fell over.
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Kevin Day [mailto:toasty@dragondata.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:16 PM To: Mathias Wolkert Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Network diagram software
On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:06 AM, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
/Tias
Two packages that I'm looking at right now for a project.
RackMonkey http://flux.org.uk/projects/rackmonkey/
Simple, AJAX-ified, looks very easy to use for non-nerds. Keeps track of rack space allocations, devices, even does some neat tricks using Dell service tags to let you see warranty/config info.
You remind me of a design discussion, well-lubricated with beer, in which my team was trying, in spite of top management, to design great carrier routers. At one point, partially for RFC4098 benchmarking, we wanted to put a GPS card into some prototypes, originally as a time reference.
We started thinking what else we could do with it, assuming we could get an enhanced-accuracy GPS (DGPS/WAAS) signal into the machine room. Physical inventory became a possibility. Somewhere, however, it started moving into the silly, including oscillation indicating earthquakes, and then graceful arcs as the rack fell over.
Maybe not so silly : http://gizmodo.com/383605/laptop-accelerometers-used-to-study-earthquakes-de... Regards Marshall
Quoting Mathias Wolkert <mathias.wolkert@gmail.com>:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
/Tias
I know what you mean about the straight jacket, Visio used to almost drive me to the sanitarium. One day I bit the bullet and RTFM (and a book) and now I don't find it so frustrating ;) I have in the past used SmartDraw (http://www.smartdraw.com), it's commercial, but IMHO resonably priced, and I found it quick and easy to whip up network diagrams with it. It's also pretty good at flow charts. Just my $0.05
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yo All! Quoting Mathias Wolkert <mathias.wolkert@gmail.com>:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
I am surprised no one has mentioned the Draw program in Open Office. It has smart connectors like Vizio. It runs on WinXX, OS X, Linux, etc., and it is free. It uses SVG so you can even generate files with any language you are handy with. The main problem is the very few templates. RGDS GARY - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97701 gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJk12EBmnRqz71OvMRAop5AJ0XvgNU5a/kRESzD9FsW8nJKVIGWQCffDaC 5rxGsAerbq6w4tWSJXr208w= =+W9a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I'm surprised no one has mentioned NetBrain. It can automatically (via discovery, or device configs) create Network diagrams that can be exported to Visio. http://www.netbraintech.com/web_08/solutions/na.php Chris Quoting Mathias Wolkert <mathias.wolkert@gmail.com>:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
On 2/11/2009 at 3:15 PM, <jay@miscreant.org> wrote: Quoting Mathias Wolkert <mathias.wolkert@gmail.com>:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks. Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me. I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
/Tias
I know what you mean about the straight jacket, Visio used to almost drive me to the sanitarium. One day I bit the bullet and RTFM (and a book) and now I don't find it so frustrating ;)
I have in the past used SmartDraw (http://www.smartdraw.com), it's commercial, but IMHO resonably priced, and I found it quick and easy to whip up network diagrams with it. It's also pretty good at flow charts.
Don't touch smartdraw. Spammers.
participants (32)
-
(nanog) Brian Battle -
Adam Fields -
Amit Kaushal -
Bill Woodcock -
Brad Fleming -
Brian Feeny -
Chris Garcia -
Chris Meidinger -
chuck goolsbee -
Colin Alston -
Craig Holland -
Crist Clark -
David Andersen -
Gary E. Miller -
Howard C. Berkowitz -
Jason Dearborn -
jay＠miscreant.org -
Joe Provo -
John Osmon -
Ken A -
Kevin Day -
Malte von dem Hagen -
Marshall Eubanks -
Mathias Wolkert -
Michael Hallgren -
Min -
Ray Burkholder -
Ross Vandegrift -
seph -
Stephens, Josh -
Tim Chown -
William Warren