Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it. I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE. On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Adam Rothschild wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused here. You're reporting 20% packet loss, and then pasted ping output indicating zero packet loss. What's the dilly?
-adam
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:38:19PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote:
Is anyone else having problems with packet-loss through MAE-EAST? We're down 20% to MAE-E and I'm almost certain it is as result of packet-loss.
No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it.
core1-Col>en Password: core1-Col#term length 20 core1-Col#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: vie1 Translating "vie1"...domain server (206.183.224.8) [OK]
Repeat count [5]: 250 Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 250, 100-byte ICMP Echoes to 206.183.226.36, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (250/250), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/36 ms
John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 06:54:04PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote:
Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it.
I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE.
Yes ? Why don't you show where the problem is, then it's easier to try to narrow the problem down to a specific switch - or to you port/router. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
At 09:23 09/02/00 +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote: If Mae-East/Mae-West/Mae-Houston/Mae-LA stats were up to date (ends Nov 21, 1999), perhaps we could find a pattern related to the distributed DoS going on: http://www.mfsdatanet.com:80/MAE/east.stats.html -Hank
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 06:54:04PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote:
Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it.
I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE.
Yes ? Why don't you show where the problem is, then it's easier to try to narrow the problem down to a specific switch - or to you port/router.
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
participants (3)
-
Hank Nussbacher -
Jesper Skriver -
NANOG Mailing List