RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
"Paul Stewart" <pstewart@nexicomgroup.net> wrote:
What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done sometimes....
Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than RFC1918 gives you. In a closed lab. Yes, it is ugly. Been there. Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
Paul
--Johnny
Le lundi 02 février 2009 à 19:22 +0000, Johnny Eriksson a écrit :
"Paul Stewart" <pstewart@nexicomgroup.net> wrote:
What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done sometimes....
Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than RFC1918 gives you.
Use IPv6. Cheers, mh
In a closed lab. Yes, it is ugly.
Been there.
Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
Paul
--Johnny
-- michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
participants (2)
-
Johnny Eriksson -
Michael Hallgren