RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea)
Sound like an any to any end to end signaling/control mechanism with authentication capabilities. Smell fishy (packet version of dial tone?) -----Original Message----- From: Alex Bligh [mailto:alex@alex.org.uk] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:48 PM To: Tony Hain; nanog@merit.edu Cc: Alex Bligh Subject: Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) The real problem here is that there are TWO problems which interact. It is a specific case of the following general problem: * A desire for any to any end to end connectivity using the protocol concerned => filter free internet * No authentication scheme
--On 17 February 2004 16:10 -0600 "Chen, Weijing" <Weijing_Chen@labs.sbc.com> wrote:
Sound like an any to any end to end signaling/control mechanism with authentication capabilities. Smell fishy (packet version of dial tone?)
Since when had dialtone got end-to-end signalling/control? My POTS line doesn't run C7/SS7. I mean authentication as in scp (and not tftp). IE one end user authorizes the other end user, using whatever credentials they like. Alex
participants (2)
-
Alex Bligh -
Chen, Weijing