Re: ** Forged spamming going on
At 02:16 PM 12/21/1998 -0500, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 1998 at 12:38:01PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
Actually, I think this might qualify AOL for the RBL, since they are sending unsolicited mail and won't stop. Thats supposed to be the only qualifier, right?
I'm going to assume you're kidding...
No. It is the only qualification. They do meet the qualification. I'm asking for them to be added since they meet the requirements as specified for Network Solutions. I don't seriously expect that they will added. I expect that the requirements for the RBL will change instead. --Dean ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean@av8.com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On Mon, Dec 21, 1998 at 02:23:33PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
I'm going to assume you're kidding...
No. It is the only qualification. They do meet the qualification. I'm asking for them to be added since they meet the requirements as specified for Network Solutions.
I don't seriously expect that they will added. I expect that the requirements for the RBL will change instead.
I know I've asked you this, but: How exactly does sending automated bounce messages equal spamming? -- Steve Sobol [sjsobol@nacs.net] Part-time Support Droid [support@nacs.net] NACS Spaminator [abuse@nacs.net] Proud resident of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, the coolest place on earth. http://www.ClevelandHeights.com
participants (2)
-
Dean Anderson -
Steven J. Sobol