Re: fcc ruling on dsl providers' access to infrastructure
I believe it is called facism. A big bald Italian mentioned something about trains running on time. Randy Bush wrote:
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:22:23 -1000 To: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> Subject: Re: fcc ruling on dsl providers' access to infrastructure
Yes there is a major concern that the government has just ellminated every isp that is currently permitted to use another carriers dsl lines to provide service's. will the ilec's start offering competitive services (not bw, but non-dynamic ips or small blocks to end-users?) if their competition has been eliminated by fcc ruling, what does 'competitive' pricing mean? that which is set by the gov't rulings? :)
and, for this morning's pop quiz, what is the classic term for an economy of private ownership and government control?
randy
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:22:23 -1000 To: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> Subject: Re: fcc ruling on dsl providers' access to infrastructure
and, for this morning's pop quiz, what is the classic term for an economy of private ownership and government control?
On 8/8/2005 8:23 AM, Scott McGrath wrote:
I believe it is called facism. A big bald Italian mentioned something about trains running on time.
Let's not confuse deregulation with the big 'F', which was state and ~trade union as much as ~business or anyone else. I mean, using the ultra-relativistic measure that is being loosely applied here, the previous existing regulations were also fascistic. We now return to our regularly scheduled broadcast of shrill, one-sided and uneducated diatribes -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
participants (2)
-
Eric A. Hall -
Scott McGrath