Hi, Don't know 1.0.0.0 assigned to: ARIN Database> 1.0.0.0 IANA (RESERVED-9) Netname: RESERVED-9 Netnumber: 1.0.0.0 Coordinator: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA-ARIN) iana@iana.org (310) 822-1511 Record last updated on 02-Mar-98. Database last updated on 12-May-98 16:09:12 EDT. The ARIN Registration Services Host contains ONLY Internet Network Information: Networks, ASN's, and related POC's. Please use the whois server at rs.internic.net for DOMAIN related Information and nic.ddn.mil for MILNET Information. Thank you, Joe McGean Netwatch PSINet
On Wed, May 13, 1998 at 03:19:34AM -0400, Joseph McGean wrote:
Don't know 1.0.0.0 assigned to:
ARIN Database> 1.0.0.0 IANA (RESERVED-9)
Yes, Joe; we knew that. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "Two words: Darth Doogie." -- Jason Colby, Tampa Bay, Florida on alt.fan.heinlein +1 813 790 7592 Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com
so how do companies sue the internic: wwwdell.com wwwsun.com wwwibm.com wwwcompaq.com are just a few of the typo-happy abusers I've found this afternoon. in dell's case it was an explicit porno site. steve c blair tivoli systems inc sblair splat dev.tivoli.com Chance favors the prepared mind
so how do companies sue the internic:
It's best not to... See the domain name dispute policy at http://www.rs.internic.net/domain-info/internic-domain-6.html
wwwdell.com wwwsun.com wwwibm.com wwwcompaq.com
are just a few of the typo-happy abusers I've found this afternoon. in dell's case it was an explicit porno site.
Only took us a short while to get "enron.net" back from the goober that cybersquatted on it. Then again, I did read a scroll of unleash lawyers... Stan -- Stanley P. Hanks Vice President, Engineering / Enron Communications 210 SW Morrison St., Suite 400 / Portland OR 97204 vox (503) 464-8480 / fax (503) 464-2042 / email stan_hanks@enron.net
On Wed, May 13, 1998 at 06:47:59PM -0500, steve c blair wrote:
so how do companies sue the internic:
wwwdell.com wwwsun.com wwwibm.com wwwcompaq.com
are just a few of the typo-happy abusers I've found this afternoon. in dell's case it was an explicit porno site.
If there is a suit, it would most likely not be against the Internic, it would be against the porn sites... -- Steven J. Sobol - Founding Member, Postmaster/Webmaster, ISP Liaison -- Forum for Responsible & Ethical E-mail (FREE) - Dedicated to education about, and prevention of, Unsolicited Broadcast E-mail (UBE), also known as SPAM. Info: http://www.ybecker.net or Usenet: <6i6eeu$kr9$1@camel18.mindspring.com> mailto: sjsobol@nstc.com, sjsobol@nacs.net, sjsobol@apk.net
At 18:47 5/13/98 -0500, you wrote:
so how do companies sue the internic:
wwwdell.com wwwsun.com wwwibm.com wwwcompaq.com
Tell the respective companies, let them handle it. InterNIC won't get involved except by court order (as a rule), so they'll probably have to get their legal staff on it (assuming they care). Spam(tm) is pressed meat. Spammers should be too. Dean Robb PC-Easy On-site computer services (757) 495-EASY [3279]
participants (6)
-
Dean Robb -
Jay R. Ashworth -
Joseph McGean -
Stan Hanks -
steve c blair -
Steve Sobol