RE: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making
Subject: RE: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:11:52 -0500 From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
On Monday 07 Nov 2005 3:42 pm, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
It's an argument for vendor diversity.
No it is an argument for code base diversity (or better software engineering).
Vendor diversity doesn't necessarily give you this, and you can get this with one vendor.
How so? Haven't we recently seen an across the board bug in multiple version of $vendor code?
Excerpt from "Logic 101 -- Introductory Logical Reasoning": "Can" does not mean the same thing as "will". And, thus, the fact that one vendor has an across-the-board bug does _not_ mean that the same situation exists at =all= vendors.. The bug in multiple versions ov $vendor's code was directly attributable to those 'multiple versions' all being derived (at different points in time, and/or for different deployment niches) from the same primary 'code base'. Note: "code base", *singular*. The problem existed in the core code, so, naturally, it was present in all the varients of that *single* core.
Vendor diversity might be a good idea, but for other reasons.
Sure. There are more reasons than one to do it. I was specifically pointing out that code diversity is a good one - and not forgetting associated cost and economic impacts as mentioned in a later followup.
Vendor diversity does *not* _guarantee_ diversity in code-base. You have to *explicitly* spec/check/test for code-base diversity, to ensure that you have code-base diversity. It is _possible_ to get code-base diversity with multiple purchases from a single manufacturer/vendor. It is _possible_ to have a single common code-base among purchases from disparate manufacturers/vendors. The "probability" of getting things with different code-bases -- *without* *actually*checking*for*it* -- is higher if you purchase from multiple manufacturers/vendors, rather than from a single one. "Higher probability" != "guaranteed" Hence the need to explicitly check, if said diversity is a requirement.
participants (1)
-
Robert Bonomi